Op 11 jan 2011, om 17:34 heeft Tony Lindgren het volgende geschreven:
* Anand Gadiyar gadi...@ti.com [110111 03:04]:
Koen Kooi wrote:
Are there any plans to do a 2.6.37-omap1 tag?
Given that linux-omap is now closely tracking mainline, is
this still needed?
Those tags are no longer
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 11 jan 2011, om 17:34 heeft Tony Lindgren het volgende geschreven:
* Anand Gadiyar gadi...@ti.com [110111 03:04]:
Koen Kooi wrote:
Are there any plans to do a 2.6.37-omap1 tag?
Given that linux-omap is now closely tracking mainline
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 19:03 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 11 jan 2011, om 17:34 heeft Tony Lindgren het volgende geschreven:
* Anand Gadiyar gadi...@ti.com [110111 03:04]:
Koen Kooi wrote:
Are there any plans to do a 2.6.37-omap1 tag?
Given that linux-omap is now closely tracking
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 19:03 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 11 jan 2011, om 17:34 heeft Tony Lindgren het volgende geschreven:
* Anand Gadiyar gadi...@ti.com [110111 03:04]:
Koen Kooi wrote:
Are there any plans to do a 2.6.37-omap1 tag?
Given that linux-omap is now closely tracking
Hi,
Are there any plans to do a 2.6.37-omap1 tag?
regards,
Koen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Koen Kooi wrote:
Are there any plans to do a 2.6.37-omap1 tag?
Given that linux-omap is now closely tracking mainline, is
this still needed?
- Anand
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info