On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Better yet (IMHO): just enable the zboot command in U-Boot to let you
boot a zImage binary directly.
I wish it were that easy but it isn't. I've no idea where to get a
version of uboot for my boards which supports that; TI have
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:20:24AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Better yet (IMHO): just enable the zboot command in U-Boot to let you
boot a zImage binary directly.
I wish it were that easy but it isn't. I've no
On Thursday 31 January 2013 04:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:20:24AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Better yet (IMHO): just enable the zboot command in U-Boot to let you
boot a zImage
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:19:59PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 04:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:20:24AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:19:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Better yet (IMHO):
On Thursday 31 January 2013 06:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:19:59PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 04:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:20:24AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jan
On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:30 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 06:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:19:59PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 04:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:30:01PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Linus' tip(commit: 04c2eee5) + arm-soc for-next boots fine as well.
The pull request from Tony [1] fixed the multi-platform boot issue
for OMAP.
Now trying to merge your for-next and test.
Well, my tip (which is based on
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:13:20PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:30:01PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Linus' tip(commit: 04c2eee5) + arm-soc for-next boots fine as well.
The pull request from Tony [1] fixed the multi-platform boot issue
for OMAP.
On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:46 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:13:20PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:30:01PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Linus' tip(commit: 04c2eee5) + arm-soc for-next boots fine as well.
The pull
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:50:15PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:46 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:13:20PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:30:01PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Linus'
On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:57 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:50:15PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:46 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:13:20PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130131 06:45]:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:57 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
# 13 Jan 2013: Update for OMAP moving to multiplatform
CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM=y
CONFIG_ARCH_MULTI_V7=y
don't fix it either, it needs more options
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
too. It also looks like Versatile Express support _can't_ be disabled in
a multiplatform kernel, which is ludicrous.
Should we go with this approach?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1774521/
--
To
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:01:14PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
too. It also looks like Versatile Express support _can't_ be disabled in
a multiplatform kernel, which is ludicrous.
Should we go with
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:00:02AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130131 06:45]:
On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:57 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
# 13 Jan 2013: Update for OMAP moving to multiplatform
CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM=y
On Thursday 31 January 2013 16:18:23 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:01:14PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
too. It also looks like Versatile Express support _can't_ be
Having spent today sorting out the Realview EB boot, the last thing
I expected to find was that both my OMAP platforms are unbootable
to the point that absolutely nothing happens after the boot loader
transfers control.
I've not been running the boots for about a month, so I'm not sure
when this
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:49:12AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Having spent today sorting out the Realview EB boot, the last thing
I expected to find was that both my OMAP platforms are unbootable
to the point that absolutely nothing happens after the boot loader
transfers control.
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
My Panda ES works with omap2plus_defconfig, but I just noticed that the
in-kernel uImage target will use a bad load/entry address so loading and
booting that uImage will hang u-boot:
Image Name: Linux-3.8.0-rc5-00389-g120d4a8
Created: Wed
19 matches
Mail list logo
