On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 19:45 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:52:18PM +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:17 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote:
But in order to do so, I need the changes that Afzal has submitted
(in particular [3]). Those changes (and as a
Hi Ivan,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 23:15:27, Ivan Djelic wrote:
So, when Afzal's patches are pushed, I'll submit a new, single MTD patch.
But this is not going to happen this merge window as I understood, may
be not even the next one. We need to make UBIFS happy sooner than that,
I
Hi Ivan,
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 21:01:42, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Note that I could prepare a new MTD patch with BCH ecc code included,
allowing to drop the GPMC BCH ecc api.
OK, let's do that then. I'll drop this patch and you can coordinate
your patch with Afzal.
Now that some review
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 08:31 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Note that I could prepare a new MTD patch with BCH ecc code included,
allowing to drop the GPMC BCH ecc api.
OK, let's do that then. I'll drop this patch and you can coordinate
your patch with Afzal.
Ivan, so are you going to send
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:17 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote:
But in order to do so, I need the changes that Afzal has submitted
(in particular [3]). Those changes (and as a consequence, my new patch)
won't hit 3.5.
So, when Afzal's patches are pushed, I'll submit a new, single MTD patch.
But this
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:52:18PM +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:17 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote:
But in order to do so, I need the changes that Afzal has submitted
(in particular [3]). Those changes (and as a consequence, my new patch)
won't hit 3.5.
So, when
* Ivan Djelic ivan.dje...@parrot.com [120510 10:49]:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:52:18PM +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:17 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote:
But in order to do so, I need the changes that Afzal has submitted
(in particular [3]). Those changes (and as a
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:29:28AM +0100, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Ivan Djelic ivan.dje...@parrot.com [120426 05:23]:
Hello,
Here is version 3 of this patch after review from Tony Lindgren.
This version adds a separate initialization function mostly to check CPU
compatibility. This check
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:29:28AM +0100, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Ivan Djelic ivan.dje...@parrot.com [120426 05:23]:
Hello,
Here is version 3 of this patch after review from Tony Lindgren.
This version adds a separate initialization function mostly to check CPU
compatibility. This check
* Ivan Djelic ivan.dje...@parrot.com [120509 01:15]:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:29:28AM +0100, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Ivan Djelic ivan.dje...@parrot.com [120426 05:23]:
Hello,
Here is version 3 of this patch after review from Tony Lindgren.
This version adds a separate
* Ivan Djelic ivan.dje...@parrot.com [120426 05:23]:
Hello,
Here is version 3 of this patch after review from Tony Lindgren.
This version adds a separate initialization function mostly to check CPU
compatibility. This check cannot be done in gpmc_enable_hwecc_bch() (which
is meant to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
