Hi,
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 20:03:28 Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:11:39PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Ah, now I understand what you mean. Would 'activated' be better than
'active'?
Better, yes, though it still sounds a bit like something should be
actively (IYSWIM)
On Friday, December 03, 2010 15:54:08 Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:50:58PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Friday 03 December 2010 13:06:18 Hans Verkuil wrote:
Just to confirm thinks, Mark's proposal is to replace 'connected' by
'linked' and 'active' by 'connected'.
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 06:13:35PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Personally I think this is perfectly clear. The original confusion came from
the word 'active', which I understand means 'streaming' in alsa. By adding
a 'streaming' flag in addition to the active flag I think it will be clear
that
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 18:55:05 Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 06:13:35PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Personally I think this is perfectly clear. The original confusion came from
the word 'active', which I understand means 'streaming' in alsa. By adding
a 'streaming' flag
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:11:39PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
Ah, now I understand what you mean. Would 'activated' be better than 'active'?
Better, yes, though it still sounds a bit like something should be
actively (IYSWIM) happening. In the absence of better ideas I could go
with this.
Hi Hans,
Adding by the original CC list which was dropped by mistake.
On Friday 03 December 2010 13:06:18 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Friday, December 03, 2010 11:19:36 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Sunday 28 November 2010 16:57:00 you wrote:
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 13:34:45 Laurent Pinchart
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:50:58PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Friday 03 December 2010 13:06:18 Hans Verkuil wrote:
Just to confirm thinks, Mark's proposal is to replace 'connected' by
'linked' and 'active' by 'connected'. Are we on the same page here ?
Yes, but when I read it
Hi Mark,
On Friday 26 November 2010 15:14:42 Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:13:36PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 16:49:52 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
It's supposed to reflect whether the
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 13:34:45 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Friday 26 November 2010 15:14:42 Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:13:36PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 16:49:52 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:40:41PM
Hi Mark,
On Thursday 25 November 2010 16:49:52 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 14:36:50 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:28:10AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
+ MEDIA_LINK_FLAG_ACTIVE
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:13:36PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 16:49:52 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:40:41PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
It's supposed to reflect whether the link can carry data. Think of the
active flag as a valve on a
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:28:10AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
+Links have flags that describe the link capabilities and state.
+ MEDIA_LINK_FLAG_ACTIVE indicates that the link is active and can be
+ used to transfer media data. When two or more links target a sink pad,
+ only
Hi Mark,
On Thursday 25 November 2010 14:36:50 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:28:10AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
+Links have flags that describe the link capabilities and state.
+ MEDIA_LINK_FLAG_ACTIVE indicates that the link is active and can be
+ used to
13 matches
Mail list logo
