On Tuesday 09 June 2009 10:14:58 tero.kri...@nokia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: ext Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: 08 June, 2009 20:24
To: Jean Pihet
Cc: Paul Walmsley; Kristo Tero (Nokia-D/Tampere); linux-omap
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] OMAP3: add
Paul,
Here is the updated patch that fixes the Overo build as well.
Can you check it?
Kevin, can you push it if it is correct?
Regards,
Jean
From ebe57354b0de059e1f042e0c488f761853f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:19:00 +0200
Subject
2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:49:53 +0200
Subject: OMAP3 Pandora: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects
This allows the self refresh to work correctly on
Pandora.
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c |8
Hi Tero,
You should also ensure that the CKE signals mux settings are correct cf. an
example for Overo at http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/28598/.
Note: the config option CONFIG_OMAP_MUX must be set for the omap_cfg*
functions to have any effect.
Regards,
Jean
On Monday 08 June 2009
On Monday 08 June 2009 16:59:36 Kevin Hilman wrote:
Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com writes:
Paul,
Here is the updated patch that fixes the Overo build as well.
Can you check it?
Kevin, can you push it if it is correct?
Can you run it through checkpatch, fix the errors and also merge
Hi Kevin,
On Monday 08 June 2009 13:01:18 Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
static void __init omap3pandora_init_irq(void)
{
- omap2_init_common_hw(mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params, NULL,
+ omap2_init_common_hw(mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params,
+
On Friday 05 June 2009 12:55:41 Elvis Dowson wrote:
HI,
Does anyone have a script that will allow me to apply all the patches
that are contained in a folder, using the git apply command?
You need to use git am for that, with the dir as parameter. git am will apply
each patch from the
that be checked on those boards?
- it is assumed that RX51 only uses 1 CS. Is that correct?
Can you review it and possibly merge?
Thanks regards,
Jean
--
From 097a640997b74638e0e7200ecd5834205204c956 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:19:00 +0200
comments can be inlined in the reply.
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Jean Pihet wrote:
Here is a patch for the SDRC 2nd CS support. It applies on top of the
current pm branch.
Thanks for doing this work.
I have some questions:
- Is it OK to copy the micron sdram params file to a new file with the 2
board have 2 sdram parts? If so I need to update the board
file as well.
Comments are welcome.
Regards,
Jean
From 517f52f4bef8225c5921b55ecd96eda2e0c4b697 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:55:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP3: add support for 2
Hi Paul,
On Saturday 09 May 2009 00:43:43 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Jean,
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Jean Pihet wrote:
On Thursday 07 May 2009 20:59:43 Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Jean Pihet wrote:
From the OMAP datasheet it looks like the ARCV setting is off:
shouldn't
Paul,
On Thursday 07 May 2009 20:59:43 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Jean
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Jean Pihet wrote:
From the OMAP datasheet it looks like the ARCV setting is off: shouldn't
it be (tREFI/tCK)+50=(7800/6)+50=0x546?
Could you elaborate further what you're seeing? It would help
On Thursday 07 May 2009 21:18:41 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Jean,
one other suggestion. You mentioned that you had self-refresh working on
another OMAP3430 board with two SDRAM chip-selects. You might consider
dumping the SDRC registers from that board, and dumping the SDRC registers
on
Hi Paul,
On Thursday 07 May 2009 01:39:02 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Jean,
sorry about the delay,
Thanks for replying!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Jean Pihet wrote:
The suspend/resume on Beagleboard has some problem due to bad memory
timings. Suspending for more than 5 to 10 seconds shows
On Thursday 07 May 2009 13:18:30 Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Thursday 07 May 2009 01:39:02 Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Jean,
sorry about the delay,
Thanks for replying!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Jean Pihet wrote:
The suspend/resume on Beagleboard has some problem due to bad memory
Hi,
The suspend/resume on Beagleboard has some problem due to bad memory timings.
Suspending for more than 5 to 10 seconds shows memory corruption.
The new chips on rev Cx boards are using 2 DDR chip selects and it looks like
the 2nd memory part is not correctly put into self refresh. As an
Hi,
On Friday 24 April 2009 15:09:29 Kevin Hilman wrote:
Nayak, Rajendra rna...@ti.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 1:35 AM
To: Nayak, Rajendra
Cc: linux-omap
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10]
Hi,
I am having problems using CPUIDLE PM_SLEEP on Beagleboard with the latest pm
tree.
It looks like CPUIDLE prevents the system to go into retention mode, while it
works fine without CPUIDLE enabled:
r...@beagleboard:~# echo 1 /sys/power/clocks_off_while_idle
r...@beagleboard:~# echo mem
driver.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak rna...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo tero.kri...@nokia.com
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
---
arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c b/arch
Hi,
I am having a crash with the latest 2.6.29 pm branch with CPU_FREQ enabled. It
looks like clk_set_rate is called recursively, thus deadlocking on the mutex.
Any idea why this worked fine on 2.6.29-rc8 pm?
Here is the dump excerpt:
...
Disabling unused clock sys_clkout1
BUG: scheduling
Hi,
Here is the new version of the patch, which now uses cpu_relax in an inline
function. The new function can be used from an irq handler as well.
Regards,
Jean
From 9d1993dcf4d217837437a1cd9f6e9c1b81533549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16
On Thursday 05 February 2009 21:32:03 Paul Walmsley wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:05:58 +0100
Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com wrote:
+ while (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host-base,
+ SYSCTL) SRD
- Resend'). Is that OK?
Related, who is the maintainer of this driver? Tony? I'd like to have
someone who checks patches before I queue them up.
Rgds
From 5ee867d09efe22a903ac7373a05e9e047bad6544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:42:51 +0100
d143f6b2e705aa4e9d2b032097fd1c82f8163262 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:35:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: MMC: recover from transfer failures
Timeouts during a command that has a data phase can result in the
next command issued after the command
Tony,
Has this patch been applied to the linux-omap tree? Does it need to go the
patchwork?
Cf. http://marc.info/?l=linux-omapm=123141577308177w=2
Regards,
Jean
On Thursday 08 January 2009 12:49:19 Jean Pihet wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, it works great (stress tested) and is a cleaner
Thanks for the suggestion, it works great (stress tested) and is a cleaner
fix.
Here is a patch the latest linux-omap-2.6 tree. Is this OK?
Regards,
Jean
From d143f6b2e705aa4e9d2b032097fd1c82f8163262 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:35:21
device removal while
transferring data.
Regards,
Jean
From 48a40925a4d57f6e7e45809a4b5c09b20f9314d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:44:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: MMC: recover from transfer failures
Timeouts during a command that has
is the patch against the hsmmc-init branch.
The patch changes the include path and the request/free free omap calls to the
standard version.
Regards,
Jean.
From a4f548c3f51c9a349decc761dd539499902873f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:22:45 +0100
device removal while
transferring data.
Regards,
Jean
From 48a40925a4d57f6e7e45809a4b5c09b20f9314d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet jpi...@mvista.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:44:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: MMC: recover from transfer failures
Timeouts during a command that has
Hi,
Here is a patch to have the OMAP2 OneNAND driver compile on the latest tree.
I do not know if this has been addressed already, here is a patch.
Regards,
Jean
From f95826f916cde9c0d0da79e006f090bc69112a1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17
Hi Kevin,
In fact the IVA2 needs to execute the WFI instruction for its domain to go
into idle.
Fortunately the IVA2 ROM code has some provision to do it in certain cases.
The trick is to reset the IVA2, configure IVA to boot in idle mode, then let
it run.
The attached patch might help.
901 - 931 of 931 matches
Mail list logo
