RE: dspbridge and the omapl1x

2010-08-12 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Ben, One thing I would like to mention is that the DMM feature does require the slave DSP to have an MMU. The OMAPL1xx devices do not have MMU for the DSP. DMM cannot be implemented without the DSP having an MMU. Hence, even if you ported DSPBridge to OMAPL1xx devices, you could not make use

RE: dspbridge and the omapl1x

2010-08-12 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Felipe, -Original Message- From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.ba...@nokia.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 11:33 AM To: Kamoolkar, Mugdha Cc: Hari Kanigeri; Ben Gardiner; Ramos Falcon, Ernesto; Uribe de Leon, Armando; Menon, Nishanth; KulikovVasiliy; Sapiens, Rene; AndyShevchenko

RE: dspbridge and the omapl1x

2010-08-12 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Ben, Re-replying with Netiquette ... I apologize for my earlier e-mail. -Original Message- From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hari Kanigeri Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 5:06 AM To: Ben Gardiner Cc: Ramos Falcon,

RE: [PATCH 3/3] omap: add hwspinlock device

2010-10-21 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote: Let's take the i2c-omap for example. It sounds like it must have a predefined hwspinlock, but what if: 1. It will use omap_hwspinlock_request() to dynamically allocate a hwspinlock 2. Obviously, the hwspinlock id number must be communicated to the

RE: [PATCH 3/3] omap: add hwspinlock device

2010-10-22 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
-Original Message- From: Ohad Ben-Cohen [mailto:o...@wizery.com] Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 2:37 PM To: Kamoolkar, Mugdha Cc: Kevin Hilman; Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T; Kamat, Nishant; linux- o...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- ker

RE: [PATCH 3/3] omap: add hwspinlock device

2010-10-22 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Hari, -Original Message- From: Kanigeri, Hari Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 5:56 PM To: Kamoolkar, Mugdha; 'Ohad Ben-Cohen'; Kevin Hilman; Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T; Kamat, Nishant Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux- arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org

RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework

2010-11-23 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Ohad, -Original Message- From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap- ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ohad Ben-Cohen Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 9:09 PM To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- ker...@lists.infradead.org Cc:

RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework

2010-11-24 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Ohad, -Original Message- From: Ohad Ben-Cohen [mailto:o...@wizery.com] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 1:29 AM To: Kamoolkar, Mugdha Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- ker...@lists.infradead.org; a...@linux-foundation.org; Greg KH; Tony