Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 24 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: If this one is OK, I'll push to my for_3.2/voltage-cleanup branch (which is already pulled into arm-soc/next/voltage) so just re-pulling will pick up the fix. Arnd, care to pull this in directly from Kevin into voltage branch? It's

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-22 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote: Found. Patch below. If this one is OK, I'll push to my for_3.2/voltage-cleanup branch (which is already pulled into arm-soc/next/voltage) so just re-pulling will pick up the fix. Looks good to me, it's always nice when a bug fix is also a

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-22 Thread Kevin Hilman
Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de writes: On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote: Found. Patch below. If this one is OK, I'll push to my for_3.2/voltage-cleanup branch (which is already pulled into arm-soc/next/voltage) so just re-pulling will pick up the fix. Looks good to me,

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 15:33:12 Tony Lindgren wrote: * Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de [110920 14:12]: On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: One more thing: my randconfig tests are running now and have spit out a new error after merging lost of stuff today: Good

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 23:46:11 Arnd Bergmann wrote: It seems that you replace the #ifdef in the board-flash.c file with a similar #ifdef in the header that replaces this with an empty inline function when the object is not built. Found another similar problem over night, presumably in

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-21 Thread Tony Lindgren
Kevin, * Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de [110921 01:55]: On Tuesday 20 September 2011 23:46:11 Arnd Bergmann wrote: It seems that you replace the #ifdef in the board-flash.c file with a similar #ifdef in the header that replaces this with an empty inline function when the object is not

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-21 Thread Kevin Hilman
Hi Arnd, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de writes: On Tuesday 20 September 2011 23:46:11 Arnd Bergmann wrote: It seems that you replace the #ifdef in the board-flash.c file with a similar #ifdef in the header that replaces this with an empty inline function when the object is not built. Found

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-21 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de [110920 23:34]: On Tuesday 20 September 2011 15:33:12 Tony Lindgren wrote: * Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de [110920 14:12]: On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: One more thing: my randconfig tests are running now and have spit out a new

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 17 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: Please pull the first part of omap cleanup from: git://github.com/tmlind/linux.git cleanup This series cleans up early_init functions and removes CHIP_IS macro usage. This makes it easier to have SoC specific init functions so adding

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-20 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de [110920 12:27]: On Saturday 17 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: Please pull the first part of omap cleanup from: git://github.com/tmlind/linux.git cleanup This series cleans up early_init functions and removes CHIP_IS macro usage. This makes it

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 17 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: Hi Arnd, Please pull the first part of omap cleanup from: git://github.com/tmlind/linux.git cleanup This series cleans up early_init functions and removes CHIP_IS macro usage. This makes it easier to have SoC specific init functions

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Saturday 17 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: Hi Arnd, Please pull the first part of omap cleanup from: git://github.com/tmlind/linux.git cleanup This series cleans up early_init functions and removes CHIP_IS macro usage.

Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-20 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de [110920 14:12]: On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: One more thing: my randconfig tests are running now and have spit out a new error after merging lost of stuff today: Good to hear you got arndconfig running :) Do you think we could also

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix missing inline functions for Makefile cleanup (Re: [GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window)

2011-09-20 Thread Tony Lindgren
Commit f41caddbe73f52a42f529d668ce47b4d693fd2c0 (omap2+: Use Kconfig symbol in Makefile instead of obj-y) cleaned up the omap2+ Makefile. However this did not account for the inline functions that are now needed for board_flash_init and board_nand_init. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de

[GIT PULL] omap cleanup part1 for v3.2 merge window

2011-09-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
Hi Arnd, Please pull the first part of omap cleanup from: git://github.com/tmlind/linux.git cleanup This series cleans up early_init functions and removes CHIP_IS macro usage. This makes it easier to have SoC specific init functions so adding support for new omap variants does not require