Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com writes:
On 9/17/2011 6:13 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 04:43:19PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
[...]
+}
+
+static int _omap_device_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
+ unsigned long event, void *dev)
On 9/17/2011 6:13 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 04:43:19PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add a notifier called during device_add phase. If an of_node is present,
retrieve the hwmod entry in order to populate properly the omap_device
structure.
For the moment the resource from
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 04:43:19PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add a notifier called during device_add phase. If an of_node is present,
retrieve the hwmod entry in order to populate properly the omap_device
structure.
For the moment the resource from the device-tree are overloaded.
DT does
Add a notifier called during device_add phase. If an of_node is present,
retrieve the hwmod entry in order to populate properly the omap_device
structure.
For the moment the resource from the device-tree are overloaded.
DT does not support named resource yet, and thus, most driver
will not work
