* Russell King r...@arm.linux.org.uk [090803 20:26]:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:36:12PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Santosh,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:30:48AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
From: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
(Rebased on 2.6.31-rc4)
The
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:51:00PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Russell King r...@arm.linux.org.uk [090803 20:26]:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:36:12PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Santosh,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:30:48AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
From: Russell
Anyways would be nice to get this in as a fix.
I applied it to my for-next branch for now, and I'll also try to have
Linus
pulling it.
Thanks
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:36:12PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Santosh,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:30:48AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
From: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
(Rebased on 2.6.31-rc4)
The TWL4030 IRQ handler has a bug which leads to spinlock lock-up. It
@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk;
Russell King
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: TWL4030 IRQ
From: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
(Rebased on 2.6.31-rc4)
The TWL4030 IRQ handler has a bug which leads to spinlock lock-up. It is
calling the 'unmask' function
From: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
(Rebased on 2.6.31-rc4)
The TWL4030 IRQ handler has a bug which leads to spinlock lock-up. It is
calling the 'unmask' function in a process context. :The mask/unmask/ack
functions are only designed to be called from the IRQ handler code,
or the
