2011/9/13 Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com:
2011/9/13 Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org:
On 13 September 2011 13:16, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
if test pass, to the patch, and even for the moment, to the API's idea
Acked-by: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
one issue i noticed is with
On 15 September 2011 12:01, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/13 Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com:
2011/9/13 Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org:
On 13 September 2011 13:16, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
if test pass, to the patch, and even for the moment, to the API's idea
2011/9/15 Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org:
On 15 September 2011 12:01, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/13 Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com:
2011/9/13 Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org:
On 13 September 2011 13:16, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
if test pass, to the patch,
2011/9/15 Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org:
On 15 September 2011 12:01, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/13 Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com:
2011/9/13 Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org:
On 13 September 2011 13:16, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
if test pass, to the patch,
?
no until now, but i need to test as i said since there is nobody else
has used it before. so i just hold the formal ACK for a moment.
Because only three days ago you said
{
Jassi, you might think my reply as an ACK to [PATCH] DMAEngine:
Define generic transfer request api.
}
if test pass
On 13 September 2011 13:16, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
if test pass, to the patch, and even for the moment, to the API's idea
Acked-by: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
one issue i noticed is with a device_prep_dma_genxfer, i don't need
device_prep_slave_sg any more,
Yeah, the
2011/9/13 Jassi Brar jaswinder.si...@linaro.org:
On 13 September 2011 13:16, Barry Song 21cn...@gmail.com wrote:
if test pass, to the patch, and even for the moment, to the API's idea
Acked-by: Barry Song baohua.s...@csr.com
one issue i noticed is with a device_prep_dma_genxfer, i don't need
Define a new api that could be used for doing fancy data transfers
like interleaved to contiguous copy and vice-versa.
Traditional SG_list based transfers tend to be very inefficient in
such cases as where the interleave and chunk are only a few bytes,
which call for a very condensed api to
] DMAEngine:
Define generic transfer request api.
}
The api met your requirements easily not because I know them already,
but because I designed the api to be as generic as practically possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord
since there is nobody else
has used it before. so i just hold the formal ACK for a moment.
Because only three days ago you said
{
Jassi, you might think my reply as an ACK to [PATCH] DMAEngine:
Define generic transfer request api.
}
if test pass, to the patch, and even for the moment
On Aug 19, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Koul, Vinod wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
Currently we have two approaches to solve this problem first being the
DMA_STRIDE_CONFIG proposed by Linus W, I
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
Currently we have two approaches to solve this problem first being the
DMA_STRIDE_CONFIG proposed by Linus W, I feel this one is better
approach as this can
2011/8/19 Koul, Vinod vinod.k...@intel.com:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
I think Sundaram is in the position of doing some heavy work on
using one or the other of the API:s, and I think he is
On 19 August 2011 22:58, Koul, Vinod vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 21:16 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
On 19 August 2011 19:49, Linus Walleij linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/19 Koul, Vinod vinod.k...@intel.com:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 16:44 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
Define a new api that could be used for doing fancy data transfers
like interleaved to contiguous copy and vice-versa.
Traditional SG_list based transfers tend to be very inefficient in
such cases as where the interleave and chunk are only a
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod vinod.k...@intel.com wrote:
Currently we have two approaches to solve this problem first being the
DMA_STRIDE_CONFIG proposed by Linus W, I feel this one is better
approach as this can give client ability to configure each transfer
rather than set
Define a new api that could be used for doing fancy data transfers
like interleaved to contiguous copy and vice-versa.
Traditional SG_list based transfers tend to be very inefficient in
such cases as where the interleave and chunk are only a few bytes,
which call for a very condensed api to convey
17 matches
Mail list logo
