[snip]
Now I really started liking this patch.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@stericsson.com
Which shall be interpreted as for the patch with the above code, not
the one which is subject for this post I believe.
Pierre, I can't locate your patches for some reason, care to
2011/1/25 Tardy, Pierre pierre.ta...@intel.com:
Actually in sdhci, you power off the MMC IP block, you power OFF the
MCLK (at least on our platform)
I don't know other platform where mmc clock is not controlled more or
less directlty by the sdhc IP.
This is the case with host/mmci.c.
It is
2011/1/26 Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org:
2011/1/25 Tardy, Pierre pierre.ta...@intel.com:
@@ -1231,6 +1233,27 @@ static void sdhci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc,
struct mmc_ios *ios)
goto out;
/*
+ * get/put runtime_pm usage counter at ios-clock
-Original Message-
From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 11:11 PM
To: Chris Ball
Cc: Tardy, Pierre; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Ohad Ben-Cohen; linux-omap
Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3]mmc: implemented runtime pm for mmc
2011/1/20 Chris Ball c...@laptop.org:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:45:57AM +, Tardy, Pierre wrote:
Chris,
(Sorry for top posting)
Seems we have a intel intern disagreement.
Could we have maintainer opinion on this ?
Linus W and Ohad, any input here? Thanks,
What I see is orthogonal
