On 11 November 2015 at 11:26, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/08/15 17:50, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 3 August 2015 at 14:26, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> From: Roger Quadros
>>>
>>> For platforms that doesn't have explicit regulator control
Hi,
On 25/08/15 17:50, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 3 August 2015 at 14:26, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> From: Roger Quadros
>>
>> For platforms that doesn't have explicit regulator control in MMC,
>> populate voltage-ranges in MMC device tree node and use
>>
Hi Ulf,
On Tuesday 25 August 2015 08:20 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 3 August 2015 at 14:26, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote:
From: Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com
For platforms that doesn't have explicit regulator control in MMC,
populate voltage-ranges in MMC device tree node and use
On 3 August 2015 at 14:26, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote:
From: Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com
For platforms that doesn't have explicit regulator control in MMC,
populate voltage-ranges in MMC device tree node and use
mmc_of_parse_voltage to get ocr_avail
I don't like this.
If we
From: Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com
For platforms that doesn't have explicit regulator control in MMC,
populate voltage-ranges in MMC device tree node and use
mmc_of_parse_voltage to get ocr_avail
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla lokeshvu...@ti.com