On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
So that avoid nonkillable process.
Signed-off-by: Fernando Guzman Lugo x0095...@ti.com
---
.../staging/tidspbridge/include/dspbridge/sync.h | 13 +++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2
-omap@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] staging: tidspbridge - make
sync_wait_on_event interruptible
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
x0095...@ti.com wrote:
So that avoid non-killable process.
It would be useful
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
x0095...@ti.com wrote:
So that avoid non-killable process.
It would be useful to interrupt these tasks from user-space.
A separate ioctl to do that would be needed.
I don't see use case where that
;
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 8/8] staging: tidspbridge - make
sync_wait_on_event interruptible
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
x0095...@ti.com wrote:
So that avoid non-killable
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
x0095...@ti.com wrote:
So that avoid non-killable process.
It would be useful to interrupt these tasks from user-space.
A separate ioctl to do that would be
;
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 8/8] staging: tidspbridge - make
sync_wait_on_event interruptible
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
x0095...@ti.com wrote
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo x0095...@ti.com wrote:
So that avoid non-killable process.
It would be useful to interrupt these tasks from user-space. A
separate ioctl to do that would be needed.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
