On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Implement the new runtime PM framework as a thin layer on top of the
omap_device API. Since we don't have an OMAP-specific bus, override
the runtime PM hooks for the platform_bus for the OMAP specific
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
Another way to look at the problem is that these runtime
customizations are kind of a property of the parent device
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
Another way to look at the problem
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
[...]
This affects many aspects of all drivers, from register and probe (for
early devices/drivers too!) to all the plaform_get_resource() usage, all
of which assumes a platform_driver and platform_device. I didn't look
closely, but I didn't
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
[...]
This affects many aspects of all drivers, from register and probe (for
early devices/drivers too!) to all the plaform_get_resource() usage, all
of which
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 07:46:05PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Does anyone know where we are on the defconfig problem? From what I
can see, it's mostly stalled for the time being, which is not good
news for us.
What looked
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:51:33PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 07:46:05PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Does anyone know where we are on the defconfig problem? From what I
can see, it's mostly
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Implement the new runtime PM framework as a thin layer on top of the
omap_device API. Since we don't have an OMAP-specific bus, override
the runtime PM hooks for the platform_bus for the OMAP specific
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Implement the new runtime PM framework as a thin layer on top of the
omap_device API. Since we don't have an OMAP-specific bus, override
the runtime PM hooks for
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:26:43AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
This approach is also not multiplatform friendly (cc'ing Eric and
Nicolas who are working on ARM multiplatform). It won't work for
building a kernel that supports, say, both versatile and OMAP.
And I should also point out that
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Implement the new runtime PM framework as a thin layer on top of the
omap_device
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:26:43AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
This approach is also not multiplatform friendly (cc'ing Eric and
Nicolas who are working on ARM multiplatform). It won't work for
building a
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:13:15PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:26:43AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
This approach is also not multiplatform friendly (cc'ing Eric and
Nicolas who
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Implement the new runtime PM
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
Yes, I've got patches which merge of_platform_bus_type with the
platform bus. This was an easy decision to make because the
of-specific bits (specifically, matching
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
Another way to look at the problem is that these runtime
customizations are kind of a property of the parent device (the bus,
not the bus_type). Would it make sense for parent devices to have
runtime ops to perform for each child that is
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Kevin Hilman
khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca writes:
Another way to look at the problem is that these runtime
customizations are kind of a property of the parent device (the bus,
not the bus_type). Would it make sense
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Does anyone know where we are on the defconfig problem? From what I
can see, it's mostly stalled for the time being, which is not good
news for us.
What looked to be promizing is the work by Uwe Kleine-König according to
the preview he
Implement the new runtime PM framework as a thin layer on top of the
omap_device API. Since we don't have an OMAP-specific bus, override
the runtime PM hooks for the platform_bus for the OMAP specific
implementation.
While the runtime PM API has three main states (idle, suspend, resume)
This
19 matches
Mail list logo
