Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: drop locking code from mux/divider drivers

[Tero Kristo]

On 10/24/2015 12:10 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:

On 10/01/2015 10:20 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:

TI's mux and divider clock drivers do not require locking and they do
not initialize internal spinlocks. This code was occasionally
copy-posted from generic mux/divider drivers. So remove it.

Cc: Tony Lindgren 
Cc: Sekhar Nori 
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko 
---


Gentle ping.


Queued for 4.4-rc-fixes, thanks.

-Tero




  drivers/clk/ti/divider.c | 16 +++-
  drivers/clk/ti/mux.c | 15 +++
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: drop locking code from mux/divider drivers

[Grygorii Strashko]

On 10/01/2015 10:20 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:

TI's mux and divider clock drivers do not require locking and they do
not initialize internal spinlocks. This code was occasionally
copy-posted from generic mux/divider drivers. So remove it.

Cc: Tony Lindgren 
Cc: Sekhar Nori 
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko 
---


Gentle ping.


  drivers/clk/ti/divider.c | 16 +++-
  drivers/clk/ti/mux.c | 15 +++
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)



--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html