On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:12:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> ...
>> - ret = gpiochip_add(>gc);
>> + ret = gpiochip_add_data(gc, NULL);
>> if (ret) {
>
> gpiochip_add is still mentioned in the dev_err
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
> by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
> for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
> is contained in a struct
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
> by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
> for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
> is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:12:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
> by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
> for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
> is contained in a struct contained in a
On Wednesday, December 09, 2015 6:13 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
> by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
> for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
> is contained in a struct contained in a
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:12:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
...
> @@ -55,16 +54,16 @@ static int moxart_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - bgc->gc.label = "moxart-gpio";
> - bgc->gc.request = gpiochip_generic_request;
> -
On 09.12.2015 22:12, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
> by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
> for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
> is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several
* Linus Walleij [151209 05:14]:
> The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
> by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
> for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
> is contained in a struct contained in a