This patch makes a needlessly global function static.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/raid1.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff ./drivers/md/raid1.c~current~
Just like failed drives have (F), so spare drives now have (S).
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/md.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ ./drivers/md/md.c
--- ./drivers/md/md.c~current~
Leave it unchanged if the original (0.90) is used, incase it might
be a compatability problem.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/md.c |9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ ./drivers/md/md.c
---
On reflection, a better default location for hot-adding
bitmaps with version-1 superblocks is immediately after
the superblock. There might not be much room there, but
there is usually atleast 3k, and that is a good start.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### Diffstat output
Doh. I want the physical hard-sector-size, not the current block size...
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/md.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff ./drivers/md/md.c~current~ ./drivers/md/md.c
--- ./drivers/md/md.c~current~
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:51:44PM -0400, Jim Faulkner wrote:
Hello,
Recently my department had a SAN installed, and I am in the process of
setting up one of the first Linux machines connected to it. The machine
is running Red Hat Enterprise AS4 (x86_64), which uses Linux kernel
version
--Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2005 17:26 -0400 David M. Strang
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The problem is; my array is now 26 of 28 disks -- /dev/sdm *IS* bad; it
[...]
What can I do? I don't believe this is working as intended.
I think the posts:
08.08.2005: How to recover a multiple
On Thursday September 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is somewhat of a crosspost from my thread yesterday; but I think it
deserves it's own thread atm. Some time ago, I had a device fail -- with the
help of Neil, Tyler others on the mailing list; a few patches to mdadm --
I was able to
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mdadm 2.0 had a fix for assembling version-1 arrays that would
particularly affect raid5. Try using that instead of -devel-3.
No luck --
-([EMAIL PROTECTED])-(~)- # mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
/dev/sdd
/dev/sde
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you run that with '-v' for me?
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sda is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 0.
mdadm: /dev/sdb is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 1.
mdadm: /dev/sdc is identified as a
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you run that with '-v' for me?
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sda is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 0.
mdadm: /dev/sdb is
Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you run that with '-v' for me?
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sda is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot 0.
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean I'm going to loose all my data?
No.
At least, you shouldn't, and doing the --create won't make anything
worse.
So do the --create with the 'missing', and don't add any spares.
Do a 'fsck' or whatever to check that everything is
Hi Ingo linux-kernel,
as I'm not subscribed to linix-kernel list, please send answers as with CC: PM.
thanks!
playing with the openSUSE 10.0 beta-test I slipped over problems with procinfo
etc.
so I noticed that at least suse/novell again changed the scheduler frequency HZ
from 1000 to 250.
Looks like I should run my test suite with both mdadm-1.12 and mdadm-2.0,
as this slipped through my testing. (The bug is in code that
didn't reach 2.6.13. Only -mm is affected).
Thanks,
NeilBrown
### Comments for Changeset
There are two ways to add devices to an md/raid array.
It can
Yes, a copy of the whitepaper would be most useful. If you could e-mail
it to me or make it available on a website for download, that would be
great.
thanks,
Jim Faulkner
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Callahan, Tom wrote:
Your running into the problem of the active/passive link as you stated. If
Holger Kiehl wrote:
top - 08:39:11 up 2:03, 2 users, load average: 23.01, 21.48, 15.64
Tasks: 102 total, 2 running, 100 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 17.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 78.9% wa, 0.2% hi, 3.1%
si Mem: 8124184k total, 8093068k used,31116k free,
Daniel Pittman wrote:
Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The components are 12x400GB drives attached to a 3ware 9500s-12
controller. They are configured as single disks on the controller,
ie: no hardware RAID is involved.
A quick question for you, because I have a client
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 20:38 +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The components are 12x400GB drives attached to a 3ware 9500s-12
controller. They are configured as single disks on the controller,
ie: no hardware RAID is involved.
A quick
Brad Dameron wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 20:38 +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
Christopher Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The components are 12x400GB drives attached to a 3ware 9500s-12
controller. They are configured as single disks on the controller,
ie: no hardware RAID is
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 13:50 -0400, berk walker wrote:
I guess if we were all wholesalers with a nice long lead time, that
would be great, Brad. But where, and for how much might one purchase these?
b-
http://www.topmicrousa.com/controllers--tekram.html
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 11:09 -0700, Brad Dameron wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 13:50 -0400, berk walker wrote:
I guess if we were all wholesalers with a nice long lead time, that
would be great, Brad. But where, and for how much might one purchase these?
b-
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 at 11:09am, Brad Dameron wrote
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 13:50 -0400, berk walker wrote:
I guess if we were all wholesalers with a nice long lead time, that
would be great, Brad. But where, and for how much might one purchase these?
b-
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean I'm going to loose all my data?
No.
At least, you shouldn't, and doing the --create won't make anything
worse.
So do the --create with the
Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean I'm going to loose all my data?
No.
At least, you shouldn't, and doing the --create won't make anything
worse.
So do the
On Friday September 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry. Add
-e 1
Well, I'm quite happy to report --- that worked!
Excellent!
So, once I get the bad drive replaced; and the array re-synced -- will I
want to stop the array, and execute:
mdadm -C /dev/md0 -e1 -l5 -n28 -c 128
26 matches
Mail list logo
