Hi,
thanks for the reply.
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
If you have a swap-partition or a swap-file on the device then you
should consider it normal. If not, then it is much less likely but
still possible.
I see it on two machines' ext3 root filesystems.
2. Should I repair,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, what's annoying is that I can't figure out how to bring the
drive back on line without resetting the box. It's in a hot-swap enclosure,
but power cycling the drive doesn't seem to help. I thought libata hotplug
was working? (SiI3132 card, using the sil24
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, what's annoying is that I can't figure out how to bring the
drive back on line without resetting the box. It's in a hot-swap enclosure,
but power cycling the drive doesn't seem to help. I thought libata hotplug
was working? (SiI3132
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Al Boldi wrote:
The problem is that raid1 one doesn't do striped reads, but rather uses
read-balancing per proc. Try your test with parallel reads; it should
be faster.
:
:
It would be nice if reads larger than some size were considered as
candidates for multiple
Hi,
Is parity calculation and validation for read operations supported?
Regards,
Mirko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
I've got a bugreport [0] from a user trying to use raid and uswsusp. He's
using initramfs-tools available in debian. I'll describe the problem
and my analysis, maybe you can comment on what you think. A warning: I only
have a casual understanding of raid, never looked at any code related to
Hi everyone,
I've been using the RAID subsystem quite a bit over the years. This
week, for the first time, I created a RAID6 array over loop devices that
point to files.
To my surprise the device showing in /proc/mdstat for this new array is
/dev/md127. This is a fresh system and RAID
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:55:21PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
I've got a bugreport [0] from a user trying to use raid and uswsusp. He's
using initramfs-tools available in debian. I'll describe the problem
and my analysis, maybe you can comment on what you think. A warning: I only
have a
On Tuesday, 3 April 2007 18:34, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 05:55:21PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Hi,
I've got a bugreport [0] from a user trying to use raid and uswsusp. He's
using initramfs-tools available in debian. I'll describe the problem
and my analysis, maybe
On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is parity calculation and validation for read operations supported?
I guess what you are asking is:
With raid5, I would like the drive to handle a read request by
reading all the blocks in the stripe and checking the parity. If
the
On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been using the RAID subsystem quite a bit over the years. This
week, for the first time, I created a RAID6 array over loop devices that
point to files.
To my surprise the device showing in /proc/mdstat for this new array is
On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've got a bugreport [0] from a user trying to use raid and uswsusp. He's
using initramfs-tools available in debian. I'll describe the problem
and my analysis, maybe you can comment on what you think. A warning: I only
have a casual
12 matches
Mail list logo
