On 16.12.2005 02:51, Max Waterman wrote:
Tobias Hofmann wrote:
delurk
On 15.12.2005 21:46, Brad Campbell wrote:
[...]
/me wonders in the days of reliable RAID-6 why we use RAID-5 + spare?
Just so I am clear on this : while RAID5 consumes a disk's worth of
space for parity, resulting
On 16.12.2005 02:53, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday December 15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
delurk
On 15.12.2005 21:46, Brad Campbell wrote:
Callahan, Tom wrote:
It is always wise to build in a spare however, that being said about all
raid levels. In your configuration, if a disk fails in
On 08.03.2005 14:13, Gordon Henderson wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Tobias Hofmann wrote:
[...]
I had found postings on the net claiming that doing so without
unmounting the fs on the raid, this would lead to bad things happening -
but your report seems to prove them wrong...
I've been using
On 08.03.2005 09:57, Molle Bestefich wrote:
[...]
I'm gonna CC the list anyway, hope it's okay :-).
I hope so, too... ;)
[...]
No, but I can tell you what I did.
I stuffed a bunch of cheap SATA disks and crappy controllers in an old system.
(And replaced the power supply with one that has enough
