Don't use 'unsigned' variable to track sync vs non-sync IO, as
the only thing we want to do with them is a signed comparison,
and fix up the comment which had become quite wrong.

Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

### Diffstat output
 ./drivers/md/md.c           |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 ./include/linux/raid/md_k.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/md.c       2007-05-21 11:17:57.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/md.c   2007-05-21 11:18:00.000000000 +1000
@@ -5092,7 +5092,7 @@ static int is_mddev_idle(mddev_t *mddev)
        mdk_rdev_t * rdev;
        struct list_head *tmp;
        int idle;
-       unsigned long curr_events;
+       long curr_events;
 
        idle = 1;
        ITERATE_RDEV(mddev,rdev,tmp) {
@@ -5100,20 +5100,29 @@ static int is_mddev_idle(mddev_t *mddev)
                curr_events = disk_stat_read(disk, sectors[0]) + 
                                disk_stat_read(disk, sectors[1]) - 
                                atomic_read(&disk->sync_io);
-               /* The difference between curr_events and last_events
-                * will be affected by any new non-sync IO (making
-                * curr_events bigger) and any difference in the amount of
-                * in-flight syncio (making current_events bigger or smaller)
-                * The amount in-flight is currently limited to
-                * 32*64K in raid1/10 and 256*PAGE_SIZE in raid5/6
-                * which is at most 4096 sectors.
-                * These numbers are fairly fragile and should be made
-                * more robust, probably by enforcing the
-                * 'window size' that md_do_sync sort-of uses.
+               /* sync IO will cause sync_io to increase before the disk_stats
+                * as sync_io is counted when a request starts, and
+                * disk_stats is counted when it completes.
+                * So resync activity will cause curr_events to be smaller than
+                * when there was no such activity.
+                * non-sync IO will cause disk_stat to increase without
+                * increasing sync_io so curr_events will (eventually)
+                * be larger than it was before.  Once it becomes
+                * substantially larger, the test below will cause
+                * the array to appear non-idle, and resync will slow
+                * down.
+                * If there is a lot of outstanding resync activity when
+                * we set last_event to curr_events, then all that activity
+                * completing might cause the array to appear non-idle
+                * and resync will be slowed down even though there might
+                * not have been non-resync activity.  This will only
+                * happen once though.  'last_events' will soon reflect
+                * the state where there is little or no outstanding
+                * resync requests, and further resync activity will
+                * always make curr_events less than last_events.
                 *
-                * Note: the following is an unsigned comparison.
                 */
-               if ((long)curr_events - (long)rdev->last_events > 4096) {
+               if (curr_events - rdev->last_events > 4096) {
                        rdev->last_events = curr_events;
                        idle = 0;
                }

diff .prev/include/linux/raid/md_k.h ./include/linux/raid/md_k.h
--- .prev/include/linux/raid/md_k.h     2007-05-21 11:17:57.000000000 +1000
+++ ./include/linux/raid/md_k.h 2007-05-21 11:18:00.000000000 +1000
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct mdk_rdev_s
 
        sector_t size;                  /* Device size (in blocks) */
        mddev_t *mddev;                 /* RAID array if running */
-       unsigned long last_events;      /* IO event timestamp */
+       long last_events;               /* IO event timestamp */
 
        struct block_device *bdev;      /* block device handle */
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to