Peter Rabbitson wrote:
I have been trying to figure out the best chunk size for raid10 before
migrating my server to it (currently raid1). I am looking at 3 offset
stripes, as I want to have two drive failure redundancy, and offset
striping is said to have the best write performance, with read
Neil Brown wrote:
The different block sizes in the reads will make very little
difference to the results as the kernel will be doing read-ahead for
you. If you want to really test throughput at different block sizes
you need to insert random seeks.
Neil, thank you for the time and effort to
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Is this anywhere near the top of the todo list, or for now raid10 users
are bound to a maximum read speed of a two drive combination?
I have not done any testing with the md native RAID10 implementations,
so perhaps there are some other advantages, but have you tried
Richard Scobie wrote:
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Is this anywhere near the top of the todo list, or for now raid10
users are bound to a maximum read speed of a two drive combination?
I have not done any testing with the md native RAID10 implementations,
so perhaps there are some other
On Tuesday March 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to figure out the best chunk size for raid10 before
migrating my server to it (currently raid1). I am looking at 3 offset
stripes, as I want to have two drive failure redundancy, and offset
striping is said to have the
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to figure out the best chunk size for raid10 before
By any chance did you remember to increase stripe_cache_size to match
the chunk size? If not, there you go.
At the end of /usr/src/linux/Documentation/md.txt it
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to figure out the best chunk size for raid10 before
migrating my server to it (currently raid1). I am looking at 3 offset
stripes, as I want to have two drive failure redundancy, and offset
striping is said to have the best write performance, with
