Re: LVM performance (was: Re: RAID5 to RAID6 reshape?)

2008-02-21 Thread Peter Grandi
This might be related to raid chunk positioning with respect to LVM chunk positioning. If they interfere there indeed may be some performance drop. Best to make sure that those chunks are aligned together. Interesting. I'm seeing a 20% performance drop too, with default RAID and LVM chunk

LVM performance (was: Re: RAID5 to RAID6 reshape?)

2008-02-19 Thread Oliver Martin
Janek Kozicki schrieb: hold on. This might be related to raid chunk positioning with respect to LVM chunk positioning. If they interfere there indeed may be some performance drop. Best to make sure that those chunks are aligned together. Interesting. I'm seeing a 20% performance drop too, with

Re: LVM performance (was: Re: RAID5 to RAID6 reshape?)

2008-02-19 Thread Jon Nelson
On Feb 19, 2008 1:41 PM, Oliver Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Janek Kozicki schrieb: hold on. This might be related to raid chunk positioning with respect to LVM chunk positioning. If they interfere there indeed may be some performance drop. Best to make sure that those chunks are aligned

Re: LVM performance (was: Re: RAID5 to RAID6 reshape?)

2008-02-19 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:52:21PM -0600, Jon Nelson wrote: On Feb 19, 2008 1:41 PM, Oliver Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Janek Kozicki schrieb: $ hdparm -t /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Timing buffered disk reads: 148 MB in 3.01 seconds = 49.13 MB/sec $ hdparm -t /dev/dm-0