On Tuesday October 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We talked about RAID5E a while ago, is there any thought that this would
actually happen, or is it one of the would be nice features? With
larger drives I suspect the number of drives in arrays is going down,
and anything which offers
Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday October 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious if there are plans for either of the following;
-RAID6 reshape
-RAID5 to RAID6 migration
No concrete plans with timelines and milestones and such, no.
I would like to implement both of these but I really
On Friday October 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good to hear.
I think when I first built my RAID (a few years ago) I did some research on
this;
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=bad+block+replacement+capabilities+mdad
m
And found stories where bit errors were an issue.
On Friday October 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious if there are plans for either of the following;
-RAID6 reshape
-RAID5 to RAID6 migration
No concrete plans with timelines and milestones and such, no.
I would like to implement both of these but I really don't know when I
will
Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 5:14 PM
To: Dan
Subject: Re: new features time-line
Not commenting on your overall premise, but I believe bit errors are
already logged and rewritten using parity info by md
-Mike
Dan wrote:
I am curious if there are plans for either
