Re: Last ditch plea on remote double raid5 disk failure

2008-01-01 Thread David Rees
On Dec 31, 2007 2:39 AM, Marc MERLIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: new years eve :( I was wondering if I can tell the kernel not to kick a drive out of an array if it sees a block error and just return the block error upstream, but continue otherwise (all my partitions are on a raid5 array, with

Re: Last ditch plea on remote double raid5 disk failure

2007-12-31 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday December 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm hoping that if I can get raid5 to continue despite the errors, I can bring back up enough of the server to continue, a bit like the remount-ro option in ext2/ext3. If not, oh well... Sorry, but it is oh well. I could probably make it

Re: Last ditch plea on remote double raid5 disk failure

2007-12-31 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Dec 31, 2007 1:05 PM, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday December 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm hoping that if I can get raid5 to continue despite the errors, I can bring back up enough of the server to continue, a bit like the remount-ro option in ext2/ext3. If not,

Re: Last ditch plea on remote double raid5 disk failure

2007-12-31 Thread Michael Tokarev
Neil Brown wrote: On Monday December 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm hoping that if I can get raid5 to continue despite the errors, I can bring back up enough of the server to continue, a bit like the remount-ro option in ext2/ext3. If not, oh well... Sorry, but it is oh well. Speaking

Re: Last ditch plea on remote double raid5 disk failure

2007-12-31 Thread Bill Davidsen
Michael Tokarev wrote: Neil Brown wrote: On Monday December 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm hoping that if I can get raid5 to continue despite the errors, I can bring back up enough of the server to continue, a bit like the remount-ro option in ext2/ext3. If not, oh well...