Molle Bestefich molle.bestefich at gmail.com writes:
My best guess is that it's OK and you won't loose data if you run
--zero-superblock on /dev/sd[abcd] and then create an array on
/dev/sd[abcd]1, but I do find it odd that it suddenly can't find
superblocks on /dev/sd[abcd]1.
OK, I tried
Am Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 06:10 schrieben Sie:
Care to enlighten the rest of us what did the trick?
Dex
please disregard this email .. after doing more google research i have
re-assembled the array and once again am a true believer of software
raid
BEHOLD THE POWER OF MD
-
To
i just forced a re-assemble ... and then it fixed it self
mdm -A --force /dev/md0 /dev/hd[ijk]1 (forced re-assemble on the 3 good drives)
mdm -a /dev/md0 /dev/hdl1 (re-added the bad drive and it fixed itself)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-raid in
the body of a
Hi all,
I have a RAID6 array where a disk went bad. I removed the old disk, put in an
identical one, and repartitioned the new disk. I am now trying to add the
new partition to the array, but I get this error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/hdd2
mdadm: add new device
