On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:46:38PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Using the mkinitrd patch that I posted before, the result was that
mdadm did try to bring up all raid devices but, because the raid456
module was not loaded in initrd, the raid devices were left inactive.
probably your initrd is
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:32:33PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Sure enough the LVM subsystem could make things better for one to not
need all of the PVs in the root-containing VG in order to be able to
mount root read-write, or at all, but if you think about it, if initrd
it shouldn't need
Hi Dan,
see thread http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg07742.html.
Regards,
Robert
Dan Graham schrieb:
Hello;
I have an existing, active ext3 filesystem which I would like to
convert to
a RAID 1 ext3 filesystem with minimal down time. After casting about
the web and experimenting some
Neil Brown wrote:
Is 'bitmap' the best name for the sysfs file?
It seems a bit generic to me.
write-bits-here-to-dirty-them-in-the-bitmap
is probably (no, definitely) too verbose.
dirty-in-bitmap
maybe?
bitmap-set-bits
Any better suggestions?
I like bitmap-set-bits or bitmap-dirty
