On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:15:35AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
I am pleased to announce the availability of
mdadm version 2.5.4
it looks like you did not include the patches i posted against 2.5.3
--
Luca Berra -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Communication Media Services S.r.l.
/\
\ /
I am curious if there are plans for either of the following;
-RAID6 reshape
-RAID5 to RAID6 migration
Here is why I ask, and sorry for the length.
I have an aging RAID6 with eight 250G drives as a physical volume in a
volume group. It is at about 80% capacity. I have had a couple drives fail
On Friday October 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious if there are plans for either of the following;
-RAID6 reshape
-RAID5 to RAID6 migration
No concrete plans with timelines and milestones and such, no.
I would like to implement both of these but I really don't know when I
will
Good to hear.
I think when I first built my RAID (a few years ago) I did some research on
this;
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=bad+block+replacement+capabilities+mdad
m
And found stories where bit errors were an issue.
http://www.ogre.com/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=7
After your
I am running mandrake 2006 linux.
uname -a reports
Linux dual_933 2.6.12-12mdksmp #1 SMP Fri Sep 9 17:43:23 CEST 2005 i686
Pentium III (Coppermine) unknown GNU/Linux
I created a raid 5 partition using 4 250gb ide drives and 1 200gb ide
drive (I will get a bigger drive real soon now).
I said:
