RE: mkinitrd and RAID6 on FC5

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of H. Peter Anvin } Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:49 PM } To: Guy Watkins } Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: Re: mkinitrd and RAID6 on FC5 } } Guy Watkins wrote: } Is this a REDHAT

RAID6 question

I read in processor.com that Adaptec has a RAID 6/60 that is patented. Does Linux RAID6 have a conflict? Thanks, Guy Adaptec also has announced a new family of Unified Serial (meaning 3Gbps SAS/SATA) RAID controllers for PCI Express. Five models include cards with four, eight, 12, and 16

RE: raid10 on centos 5

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruslan Sivak } Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:22 PM } To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: raid10 on centos 5 } } I am trying to set up raid 10 and so far with no luck. I have 4

RE: RAID6 question

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Watkins } Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 8:52 PM } To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: RAID6 question } } I read in processor.com that Adaptec has a RAID 6/60 that is patented

RE: raid10 on centos 5

} -Original Message- } From: Ruslan Sivak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] } Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 7:22 PM } To: Guy Watkins } Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: Re: raid10 on centos 5 } } Guy Watkins wrote: } } -Original Message- } } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux

RE: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens Axboe } Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 10:35 AM } To: Tejun Heo } Cc: David Chinner; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Phillip Susi; Neil Brown; linux- } [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dm- }

RE: mdadm create to existing raid5

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Collette } Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 5:29 PM } To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: mdadm create to existing raid5 } } I wasn't thinking and did a mdadm --create to my existing

RE: [dm-devel] Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] } Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:35 PM } To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] } Cc: Tejun Heo; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stefan Bader; Phillip Susi; device-mapper } development; [EMAIL

RE: RAID6 clean?

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Brown } Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:59 AM } To: Guy Watkins } Cc: 'linux-raid' } Subject: Re: RAID6 clean? } } On Monday June 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } I have a RAID6 array. 1

RE: very degraded RAID5, or increasing capacity by adding discs

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Scobie } Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:27 PM } To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: Re: very degraded RAID5, or increasing capacity by adding discs } } Janek Kozicki wrote:

RE: very degraded RAID5, or increasing capacity by adding discs

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janek Kozicki } Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 6:47 PM } To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: Re: very degraded RAID5, or increasing capacity by adding discs } } Janek Kozicki said:

RE: Few questions

man md man mdadm I use RAID6. Happy with it so far, but haven't had a disk failure yet. RAID5 sucks because if you have 1 failed disk and 1 bad block on any other disk, you are hosed. Hope that helps. } -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL

RE: Raid over 48 disks

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brendan Conoboy } Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 3:36 PM } To: Norman Elton } Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: Re: Raid over 48 disks } } Norman Elton wrote: } We're

RE: How many drives are bad?

} -Original Message- } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-raid- } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Fairbairn } Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:45 PM } To: 'Norman Elton' } Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org } Subject: RE: How many drives are bad? } } } } The box presents 48