Add update_desc command to opensm console
Sometimes nodes are discovered by the opensm with their default
name before real host name was resolves and updated in the HCA.
Since Mellanox ConnectX HCA do not support NodeDescription
change trap (as part of trap 144) we need an option to refresh
When -V, --version command line option is used exit with zero status
after a version showing.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky sas...@voltaire.com
---
On 08:03 Tue 05 Jan , Sean Hefty wrote:
Changes to the above components should be made to Sasha's tree first, or they
risk being lost
Hi Roland,
I would like to ask you if you have an estimation for when you will review the
patches below?
Thanks,
AlexV
Alex Vainman wrote:
Hi Roland,
Have you had a chance to look at this patch and at the patch
I've sent with this email:
Subject: [PATCH] libibverbs: Add huge page
Hi Hal,
On 08:56 Mon 11 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
diff --git a/tests/subnet_discover.c b/tests/subnet_discover.c
index 7f8a85c..42e7aee 100644
--- a/tests/subnet_discover.c
+++ b/tests/subnet_discover.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static struct node *node_array[32 * 1024];
static
Hi Ralph,
On 13:43 Mon 11 Jan , Ralph Campbell wrote:
Its been 2 months since I posted this.
What is the current status? Last comment I saw was from Ira
saying either add this functionality to ibportstate or
rename ibportstate but don't split it off into a new command.
You are right, it
On 11:56 Thu 05 Nov , Ralph Campbell wrote:
This patch adds new commands to ibportstate to support initializing
the link for CAs connected back-to-back. It also allows more than
one field to be changed at the same time such as lid 23 arm or
width 1 speed 3 enable.
Signed-off-by: Ralph
On 08:35 Thu 07 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
index f54e995..6bbbfa2 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Voltaire, Inc. All rights
Hi Eli,
On 10:32 Tue 12 Jan , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote:
Add update_desc command to opensm console
Sometimes nodes are discovered by the opensm with their default
name before real host name was resolves and updated in the HCA.
Since Mellanox ConnectX HCA do not support
Adding our correspondence to the openfabrics list:
I think it just sort of got dropped. I submitted a 5-patch set to
Roland and the list on October 24, 2007.
See the thread beginning at:
http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-October/042351.html
We didn't pursue it at the time.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 07:08:08PM +0200, Alex Vainman wrote:
+ p_hpage_val = strstr(buf, label);
+ if (!p_hpage_val) {
+ errno = EINVAL;
+ return -1;
+ }
+ p_hpage_val += strlen(label);
+
+ errno = 0;
+ ret_val = strtol(p_hpage_val,
On 10:47 Mon 11 Jan , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
Currently, if dumping SA DB is enabled, the file is dumped
at every sweep. This patch adds dirty flag that denotes
whether the SA DB needs to be dumped or not.
SA DB contains 3 types of data:
- informinfo records
- service records
-
On 14:15 Mon 04 Jan , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
rather than before so don't access invalid memory
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com
Applied. Thanks.
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to
Hi,
I am pleased to announce that OFED-RDMAoE-1.5 GA release is done
Notes:
The tarball is available on:
http://www.openfabrics.org/downloads/OFED/ofed-rdmaoe-1.5/OFED-RDMAoE-1.5.tgz
To get BUILD_ID run ofed_info
Please report any issues in bugzilla https://bugs.openfabrics.org/ for
I'm not thrilled about this patch.
+module_param_named(set_4k_mtu, mlx4_ib_set_4k_mtu, int, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(set_4k_mtu, attempt to set 4K MTU to all ConnectX ports);
What does attempt to set 4K MTU mean? Try to set the MTU cap to 4K?
What happens if it fails? Is there any reason
RoCEE (pronounced ‘rocky’) allows running the IB transport protocol
using Ethernet frames, enabling the deployment of IB semantics on
lossless Ethernet fabrics.
Just starting to review this, but let me say at the start that I really
don't like the term RoCEE for this stuff. The OFED 1.5
Note: I do not know of any SRP targets that implement approach (2). As
far as I know all SRP targets use approach (1).
But no other SRP targets send SRP_CRED_REQ -- and that includes all
native IB storage arrays that I know of. So there must be some other
way around this (and having
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Roland Dreier rdre...@cisco.com wrote:
Note: I do not know of any SRP targets that implement approach (2). As
far as I know all SRP targets use approach (1).
But no other SRP targets send SRP_CRED_REQ -- and that includes all
native IB storage arrays that
On 11:57 Thu 31 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com
Applied. Thanks.
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 11:58 Thu 31 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com
Applied. Thanks.
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Hi Hal,
On 14:10 Thu 31 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
to --details option
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com
---
diff --git a/infiniband-diags/man/ibqueryerrors.8
b/infiniband-diags/man/ibqueryerrors.8
index 83a2b5a..e7feea8 100644
---
Having separate buffer sets for command receives and response sends
might seem a sensible way to design a target. But calling
ib_post_recv() before sending a response back to the initiator is not
acceptable because this increases communication latency. When a target
uses separate buffer
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:57:35PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
I doubt you could benchmark the overhead of calling ib_post_recv() in
the full SRP protocol. Really, I bet it's less than 100 nanoseconds to
form the work request and call ib_post_recv(). Maybe I'm wrong but I
really expect the
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
[ ... ]
Also, I couldn't tell for sure from a cursory examination of the
patch, but the initiator must be designed to not stall processing the
RQ dependent on the SQ or the credit level, when using a
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Roland Dreier rdre...@cisco.com wrote:
Having separate buffer sets for command receives and response sends
might seem a sensible way to design a target. But calling
ib_post_recv() before sending a response back to the initiator is not
acceptable
24 matches
Mail list logo
