Re: [PATCH v3] opensm: support routing engine update

Slava Strebkov wrote: HI! That was my misunderstanding - upon heavy sweep SM will try to load routing engines as defined in the SM.conf file (ftree updn - in that order). So ftree will be loaded when switch comes back from reboot. Slava -Original Message- From:

Re: [PATCH v3] opensm: support routing engine update

On 14/Feb/10 12:18, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote: Slava Strebkov wrote: HI! That was my misunderstanding - upon heavy sweep SM will try to load routing engines as defined in the SM.conf file (ftree updn - in that order). So ftree will be loaded when switch comes back from reboot. Slava

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for enhanced atomic operations

Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Vladimir Sokolovsky v...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote: Sean Hefty wrote: Will Mellanox be adding this option to the IB spec rather than keep it as vendor proprietary ? Along with that question, what is the use case for this feature? The only

[PATCH V2 0/2] Add support for enhanced atomic operations

Hi Roland, This patchset adds support for the following enhanced atomic operations: - Masked atomic compare and swap - Masked atomic fetch and add These operations enable using a smaller amount of memory when using multiple locks by using portions of a 64 bit value in an atomic operation. For

[PATCH V2 1/2] IB/core: Add support for enhanced atomic operations

- Add a new IB_WR_ATOMIC_MASKED_CMP_AND_SWP and IB_WR_ATOMIC_MASKED_FETCH_AND_ADD send opcodes that can be used to mark a masked atomic compare and swap and masked atomic fetch and add work request correspondingly. - Add IB_DEVICE_MASKED_ATOMIC capability bit. - Add mask fields to atomic struct