Subject: [PATCH] Fix sl2vl configuration
For non-optimized sl2vl configuration in and out ports were reversed.
For optimal sl2vl added override of default ALL settting with port's
sl2vl when operational VL was other than the default port.
Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman e...@voltaire.com
---
copying linux-rdma list
We have done some native IB multicast development. It's
working fine at the moment.
But I have no idea how to setup APM for the IB multicast. How do we handle
switch failover with IB
multicast. It's very helpful if you can give some information
- Some time ago I observed that the kernel reported soft lockups
because of spin_lock() calls inside a completion handler. These
spinlocks were not locked in any other context than the completion
handler itself. And the lockups disappeared after having replaced the
spin_lock() calls by
thanks, applied.
--
Roland Dreier rola...@cisco.com || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
Actually, I tried to implement the completion callback
in a workqueue thread but ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc() calls
netif_tx_lock() which isn't safe unless it is called
from an IRQ handler or netif_tx_lock_bh() is called first.
Oh, sounds like a bug in IPoIB. I guess we could fix it by just
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:05 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
Actually, I tried to implement the completion callback
in a workqueue thread but ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc() calls
netif_tx_lock() which isn't safe unless it is called
from an IRQ handler or netif_tx_lock_bh() is called first.
Oh,
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:16 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
Actually, I tried to implement the completion callback
in a workqueue thread but ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc() calls
netif_tx_lock() which isn't safe unless it is called
from an IRQ handler or netif_tx_lock_bh() is called first.
Hello,
For a project we consider using RDMA CM to setup XRC connections.
Currently that combination is not supported. Has anyone done any work on
adding XRC support to RDMA CM ?
That's something we might also consider doing if not already available
somewhere. Is there any pitfall to be
For a project we consider using RDMA CM to setup XRC connections.
Currently that combination is not supported. Has anyone done any work on
adding XRC support to RDMA CM ?
Not that I'm aware of.
That's something we might also consider doing if not already available
somewhere. Is there any
thanks, applied
--
Roland Dreier rola...@cisco.com || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
10 matches
Mail list logo