From: Vipul Pandya vi...@chelsio.com
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 12:17:57 +0530
I upgraded my GCC version from 4.4.6-4 to 4.8.1 and after that I am able
to see that warning. I will resubmit this series soon.
That's fine, but realize it is too late to submit this for the current
merge window.
--
To
On 02-07-2013 12:37, David Miller wrote:
From: Vipul Pandya vi...@chelsio.com
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 12:17:57 +0530
I upgraded my GCC version from 4.4.6-4 to 4.8.1 and after that I am able
to see that warning. I will resubmit this series soon.
That's fine, but realize it is too late to
On 28.06.2013 14:49, Bart Van Assche wrote:
If reconnecting failed we know that no command completion will
be received anymore. Hence let the SCSI error handler fail such
commands immediately.
Acked-by: Sebastian Riemer sebastian.rie...@profitbricks.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
the macro is not going to break modules ABI.
In linux-next tag 20130702, they're currently:
- 15 calls to get_unused_fd_flags()
not counting get_unused_fd() and anon_inode_getfd()
- 14 calls to get_unused_fd()
- 11 calls to anon_inode_getfd()
The following patchset try to convert all calls
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 07:26:05AM -0400, David Dillow wrote:
The InfiniBand specification mentions the following about differential
receiver inputs (C6-11.2.1): A BER of 10^-12 shall be achieved when
connected to the worst case transmitter through any compliant channel.
This test
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
Also, sparse warns about [...] in mlx5_ib.h. Nor does it have any callers,
so it's a bit
hard to tell if it's really and truly a bug.
removing this function for V2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
In general I don't think overriding the CFLAGS (as you do in the mlx5
Makefiles) is a good idea, and in particular here your -Wall -Werror
break the build, at least for my gcc 4.7.3:
CC
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
So I'm inclined to apply the mlx5 driver for 3.11, since it's a
completely new driver. However, reading through it so far I had the
following comments, and I'd like these cleanups addressed along with Dave
Miller's:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:11:52AM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 01:38:26PM +, Cong Wang wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 at 08:28 GMT, Hannes Frederic Sowa
han...@stressinduktion.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:54:56AM -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
I've
