On 7/11/2013 8:25 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 06:07:44PM +0300, Yishai Hadas wrote:
+ if (sizeof(*verbs_ctx) -
+ offsetof(struct verbs_context,
+close_xrcd) = verbs_ctx-sz)
+ verbs_ctx-close_xrcd = mlx4_close_xrcd;
On 22/07/2013 18:23, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Avoid that kernel threads running mlx4_cmd_wait() contribute to the
system load by setting the task state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE instead
of TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE while waiting. This patch reduces the load
average from about 0.5 to about 0.0 on an idle
Hi to all
i'm probably OT but I don't know where to ask
I'm searching for some advice creating a dual-star topology to get
full path redundancy.
I have one dual-port DDR card on each server and two switches.
I'll connect one port to each switch, but should I also interconnect
both switches like in
This race has been spotted and fixed by Moshe Lazer two weeks ago.
Anyways,
Acked by Eli Cohen e...@mellanox.com
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:02:01AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
We can't dereference ent after passing it to free_cmd().
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
On 23/07/2013 17:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Sorry but I had overlooked the bounce buffer patch. Regarding page
sizes: is an InfiniBand HCA required to support a page size of 512
bytes ? To me it seems like the smallest page size supported by e.g.
the ocrdma driver is 4KB. From
On 07/24/13 17:17, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 22/07/2013 18:23, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Avoid that kernel threads running mlx4_cmd_wait() contribute to the
system load by setting the task state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE instead
of TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE while waiting. This patch reduces the load
average
On 24/07/2013 19:48, Bart Van Assche wrote:
I saw a load of 0.5 with several different upstream kernels (3.6..3.10
at least). The only IB-related process that was running on the system
was opensmd. This is definitely reproducible. It was only a month
after I had noticed this phenomenon that I
On 07/24/13 19:06, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 24/07/2013 19:48, Bart Van Assche wrote:
I saw a load of 0.5 with several different upstream kernels (3.6..3.10
at least). The only IB-related process that was running on the system
was opensmd. This is definitely reproducible. It was only a month
after I
Hi Gandalf,
On 7/24/2013 11:20 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
Hi to all
i'm probably OT but I don't know where to ask
I'm searching for some advice creating a dual-star topology to get
full path redundancy.
I have one dual-port DDR card on each server and two switches.
I'll connect one
On 07/24/13 19:06, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 24/07/2013 19:48, Bart Van Assche wrote:
I saw a load of 0.5 with several different upstream kernels (3.6..3.10
at least). The only IB-related process that was running on the system
was opensmd. This is definitely reproducible. It was only a month
after I
in this way all services should be dual stack with at least two
difrent addresses, one for each infiniband subnets.
I have to configure ceph on these subnets and ceph doesn't allow to
set multiple addresses for each service.
Il giorno 24/lug/2013 20:04, Hal Rosenstock h...@dev.mellanox.co.il
ha
2013/7/24 Gandalf Corvotempesta gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com:
I have to configure ceph on these subnets and ceph doesn't allow to
set multiple addresses for each service.
Let me try to explain in a better way.
I would like to create a ceph cluster over an infiniband network.
Each server has
On 7/24/2013 4:56 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
2013/7/24 Gandalf Corvotempesta gandalf.corvotempe...@gmail.com:
I have to configure ceph on these subnets and ceph doesn't allow to
set multiple addresses for each service.
Let me try to explain in a better way.
I would like to create a
The specification does not indicate that Device Mgmt is an RMPP class.
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny ira.we...@intel.com
---
drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c
index
On 7/24/2013 5:44 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
The specification does not indicate that Device Mgmt is an RMPP class.
See Annex 8; DevMgt class version 2 rather than 1 is currently supported.
-- Hal
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny ira.we...@intel.com
---
drivers/infiniband/core/mad.c |1 -
1 files
From: Sean Hefty sean.he...@intel.com
Calling cma_save_ib_info for CM SIDR REQs results in a crash
accessing an invalid path record pointer.
Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty sean.he...@intel.com
---
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Sean Hefty sean.he...@intel.com
If a application is using AF_IB with a UD QP, but does not
provide any private data, we will end up accessing invalid
memory. Check for this case and handle it appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Sean Hefty sean.he...@intel.com
---
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
From: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl
Building cma.o triggers this GCC warning:
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c: In function ‘rdma_resolve_addr’:
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:465:23: warning: ‘port’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
From: Sean Hefty sean.he...@intel.com
Additional testing of the latest AF_IB patch series showed that bugs
were introduced when mixing AF_IB with UD QPs. Full support for
AF_IB with UD QPs is limited, but we should at least avoid crashing
the kernel! Please apply two fixes for crashes to 3.11,
-Original Message-
From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:h...@dev.mellanox.co.il]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ib/mad: remove Device Mgmt from RMPP class list
On 7/24/2013 5:44 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
The specification does not indicate that Device Mgmt is an RMPP class.
See Annex 8; DevMgt class
On 7/24/2013 6:10 PM, Weiny, Ira wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Hal Rosenstock [mailto:h...@dev.mellanox.co.il]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ib/mad: remove Device Mgmt from RMPP class list
On 7/24/2013 5:44 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
The specification does not indicate that Device Mgmt is an RMPP
See Annex 8; DevMgt class version 2 rather than 1 is currently supported.
Could older devices still return version 1? If so the kernel should allow
DevMgt without RMPP, correct?
This check has been this way since 2.6.17. I think it's reasonable to say that
there aren't any devices using
Roland,
Please skip this patch. Sean, see below.
-Original Message-
From: Hefty, Sean
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:23 PM
To: Weiny, Ira; Hal Rosenstock
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; rol...@kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ib/mad: remove Device Mgmt from RMPP class list
From: Eli Cohen e...@dev.mellanox.co.il
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:35:44 +0300
This race has been spotted and fixed by Moshe Lazer two weeks ago.
Anyways,
Acked by Eli Cohen e...@mellanox.com
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a
-Original Message-
From: Hefty, Sean
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ib/mad: remove Device Mgmt from RMPP class list
See Annex 8; DevMgt class version 2 rather than 1 is currently supported.
Could older devices still return version 1? If so the kernel should
allow DevMgt without RMPP,
See Annex 8; DevMgt class version 2 rather than 1 is currently
supported.
Could older devices still return version 1? If so the kernel should
allow DevMgt without RMPP, correct?
This check has been this way since 2.6.17. I think it's reasonable to say
that
there aren't
-Original Message-
From: Hefty, Sean
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ib/mad: remove Device Mgmt from RMPP class list
See Annex 8; DevMgt class version 2 rather than 1 is currently
supported.
Could older devices still return version 1? If so the kernel
should allow DevMgt
Hi list,
I am moving my work environment on P/Linux, and I am having trouble register
large amount of memories. The device I have are ConnectX-3 EN (RoCE). i am
trying to register 16GB of memory, mmap and mlock succeeded, but ibv_reg_mr
returns ENOMEM.
Concurrently, the kernel log reports the
28 matches
Mail list logo
