Re: AW: AW: AW: IPoIB GRO

2013-11-05 Thread Erez Shitrit
I see. This didn't happen on our setups here since we tests with newer cards (ConnectX2/3/3-pro). For ConnectX1 (A0) and this firmware that you are using smells like something goes wrong. If possible, I would change to newish card. No problem with that. My journey up to here was hard but very

Re: AW: AW: AW: IPoIB GRO

2013-11-05 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 05/11/2013 10:25, Markus Stockhausen wrote: Are the TCP Ids in an TSO setup generated through firmware or in the software stack? in HW And if in firmware: How does the card know how to increase them? I would expect that it only works with IB packets and does not know of the IP

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-05 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 11/4/2013 8:41 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 14:57 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 1/11/2013 18:36, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 08:03 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 31/10/2013 5:24, Sagi Grimberg wrote: In T10-DIF, when a series of

Re: [PATCH for-next V1 8/8] IB/core: extended command: move comp_mask to the extended header

2013-11-05 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi Matan, Le mercredi 30 octobre 2013 à 11:52 +0200, Matan Barak a écrit : From: Yann Droneaud ydrone...@opteya.com The unused field in the extended header is a perfect candidate to hold the command comp_mask (eg. bit field used to handle compatibility). This was suggested by Roland Dreier

Re: [PATCH for-next V1 0/8] uverbs extensions fixes

2013-11-05 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi, Le mercredi 30 octobre 2013 à 11:52 +0200, Matan Barak a écrit : This series is a continuous improvement for the uverbs extension mechanism that was introduced as an experimental feature for v3.12. Yann Droneaud suggested and implemented the following improvements: - structure renaming

Re: [PATCH for-next V1 0/8] uverbs extensions fixes

2013-11-05 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 05/11/2013 11:05, Yann Droneaud wrote: Thanks Matan for carrying on the patchset. I've quite the same patchset, but the other way around, eg. enabling the flow steering verbs after cleanup on the new ABI. I thought it would make more sense this way. Would you like me to send the patchset

Re: AW: AW: AW: IPoIB GRO

2013-11-05 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:48:10AM +0200, Erez Shitrit wrote: so, to summarize: The HW does the work (truncates the big ip packet to series of ip packets, each with the relevant mtu size and increases the ip-id for each) The FW enables that work on the HW the FW in A0 card doesn't enable

[PATCH] librdmacm: Some fixes to man pages

2013-11-05 Thread Guy Shapiro
Fix the man pages of rdma_destroy_ep rdma_destroy_qp to the correct return value (void). --- man/rdma_destroy_ep.3 |5 + man/rdma_destroy_qp.3 |3 --- 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/rdma_destroy_ep.3 b/man/rdma_destroy_ep.3 index b48a1e5..750702a

[PATCH opensm] Fix dropping node after setPkey mad

2013-11-05 Thread Hal Rosenstock
From: Dan Ben Yosef da...@mellanox.com Need to check pkey received counter flag only after get mads and not set. Signed-off-by: Dan Ben Yosef da...@mellanox.com --- include/opensm/osm_port.h |3 ++- opensm/osm_pkey_rcv.c |3 ++- opensm/osm_port.c |6 -- 3 files

AW: AW: AW: AW: IPoIB GRO

2013-11-05 Thread Markus Stockhausen
so, to summarize: The HW does the work (truncates the big ip packet to series of ip packets, each with the relevant mtu size and increases the ip-id for each) The FW enables that work on the HW the FW in A0 card doesn't enable that option for the HW. Sounds like this bug causes a

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/10] Introduce Signature feature

2013-11-05 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 11:13 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: On 11/4/2013 8:41 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 14:57 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 1/11/2013 18:36, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 08:03 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 31/10/2013

Re: [patch v2] mlx5_core: delete some dead code

2013-11-05 Thread David Miller
From: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 01:20:56 +0300 The printk() looks like it is left over debug code. I have removed it. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com --- v2: Remove the printk instead of moving it infront of the return. This

Re: IPoIB GRO

2013-11-05 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 05/11/2013 20:08, Markus Stockhausen wrote: Incredible how a card that does not support TSO can bring big packets on the wire that somehow get reassembled on the client side not sure to follow, you have shown they are **not** reassembled, correct? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

AW: IPoIB GRO

2013-11-05 Thread Markus Stockhausen
Von: Or Gerlitz [ogerl...@mellanox.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. November 2013 08:50 An: Markus Stockhausen; Jason Gunthorpe; Erez Shitrit Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Wendy Cheng Betreff: Re: IPoIB GRO On 05/11/2013 20:08, Markus Stockhausen wrote: Incredible how a card that does not