Re: [PATCH v1 08/10] iser-target: Support the remote invalidation exception

2015-11-26 Thread Sagi Grimberg
yep, should be probably OK. You didn't respond to my comment re adding bools vs bit-fields vs bit-flags This is outside the scope of this patchset. I'm willing to look into this incrementally to this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a

Re: Future of FMR support, was: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_sync method for FMR

2015-11-26 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 25/11/2015 21:28, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:09:20AM -0800, santosh shilimkar wrote: I'd say drop the current iWarp transport if it's not testable. The only real difference between IB and iWarp is the needed to create a MR for the RDMA READ sink, and we're much