On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Yuval Shaia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Erez Shitrit wrote:
>>
>> ipoib_mcast_restart_task calls ipoib_mcast_remove_list with the
>> parameter mcast->dev. That mcast is a temporary (used as an iterator)
>> variable
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Erez Shitrit wrote:
>
> ipoib_mcast_restart_task calls ipoib_mcast_remove_list with the
> parameter mcast->dev. That mcast is a temporary (used as an iterator)
> variable that may be uninitialized.
> There is no need to send the variable dev to the
Hello, Parav.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:43:20AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > If different controllers can't agree upon the
> > same set of resources, which probably is a pretty good sign that this
> > isn't too well thought out to begin with,
>
> When you said "different controller" you meant
FYI, the only conflict as reported in linux-next last week is with nfsd
tree and "IB: merge struct ib_device_attr into struct ib_device" here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-next=145155049101826=2
It looks like there is ongoing discussion this morning wrt rdma + nfsd
trees..
Do you still want
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:46:19AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:28:02AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >> Added function pointer table to store resource pool specific
> >> operation for each resource
This patch introduces an implementation of a back-end that works with
RVT to make RoCE Verbs transport over any Ethernet network device.
Example:
After loading ib_rxe_net.ko
echo eth1 > /sys/module/ib_rxe_net/parameters/add
will create rvt0 IB device in RVT with Ethernet link layer
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Erez Shitrit wrote:
> ipoib_mcast_restart_task calls ipoib_mcast_remove_list with the
> parameter mcast->dev. That mcast is a temporary (used as an iterator)
> variable that may be uninitialized.
> There is no need to send the variable dev to the function, as each mcast
> has