On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:27:01PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:25:16PM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
dev_list = kmalloc(sizeof *dev_list, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dev_list)
@@ -1673,13 +1671,19 @@ static void ipoib_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
}
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:04:55PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 01:38:38PM -0400, ira.weiny wrote:
I don't think that is appropriate. You have been advocating that the checks
be clear as to what support we need.
Right, but this is narrow, and we
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 01:17:23PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 02:24:26PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
IPoIB is more than just an ULP. It's a spec. And it's very IB
specific. It will only work with OPA because OPA is imitating IB.
To run it on another fabric,
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:53:00AM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
Rather than calling device-process_mad() directly, would it be better
to call a common function? So we can avoid adding:
+ struct ib_mad *in_mad = (struct ib_mad *)in;
+ struct ib_mad *out_mad = (struct
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 04:43:01PM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
I understand your point and I originally called this attributes but it
was
suggested to call it cached_dev_attrs.
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma%40vger.kernel.org/msg22486.html
I can change it back if we are all
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 05:08:53PM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
Define jumbo_mad and jumbo_rmpp_mad.
I would just use 'opa_mad' in place of 'jumbo_mad'. Jumbo sounds like a
marketing term or elephant name.
Done in v5.
Jumbo MAD structures are 2K versions of ib_mad and ib_rmpp_mad
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 05:47:49PM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
@@ -236,6 +252,24 @@ enum smi_action smi_handle_dr_smp_recv(struct ib_smp
*smp, u8 node_type,
smp-dr_slid == IB_LID_PERMISSIVE);
}
+/*
+ * Adjust information for a received SMP
+ *
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:19:20AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 05:15:07PM +, Hefty, Sean wrote:
IMO, a MAD should be self-identifying.
A MAD is self-identifying (contains versions and classes).
IBoE CM MADs are a sub-set of the IB MADs. As are the PMA MADs
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:40:20PM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
-static struct ib_mad_private *alloc_mad_priv(struct ib_device *dev)
+static struct ib_mad_private *alloc_mad_priv(struct ib_device *dev,
+size_t *mad_size)
{
+ *mad_size =
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 04:39:54PM +0100, Michael Wang wrote:
There are plenty of lengthy code to check the transport type of IB device,
or the link layer type of it's port, but actually we are just speculating
whether a particular management is supported by the device/port.
Michael,
There
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:43:46PM -0600, Hefty, Sean wrote:
diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
index 0d74f1d..0116e4b 100644
--- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
+++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
@@ -1675,6 +1675,7 @@ struct ib_device {
u32
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Michael Wang wrote:
Hi, Sean
On 03/24/2015 01:49 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
On 03/23/2015 05:31 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
[snip]
To restate my suggesting, I was thinking of defining something like
this:
enum {
IB_MGMT_PROTO_SM = (1 0), /*
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 05:32:53PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
[snip]
Your claim says more or less don't touch the good old
include/rdma/ib_verbs.h from 2.6.12, just add new low-level drivers
-- this is very close to
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:17:49AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:21:50AM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 05:16:16PM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote:
Hi,
I didn't got any further comments on this one.
Any idea why SG in CM is un-welcome?
By
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:12:02PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:02:03PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
If we use something like this, then the above is all you need. Then
every place in the code that checks for something like has_sa or cap_sa
can be replaced with
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:52:44AM -0700, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Mar 13, 2015, at 1:41 AM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
This is the re-ordered, squashed version of my 22 patch set that I
posted on Feb
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:20:48PM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
On 03/30/2015 06:11 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 16:46 +0100, Michael Wang wrote:
Introduce helper has_mcast() and cap_mcast() to help us check if an
IB device or it's port support Multicast.
This probably
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 04:46:11PM +0100, Michael Wang wrote:
Introduce helper has_sa() and cap_sa() to help us check if an IB device
or it's port support Subnet Administrator.
I think these 2 should be combined. The question is if a port requires the use
of the SA depending on the network
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:28:20AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 04:46:57PM +0100, Michael Wang wrote:
Introduce helper has_mcast() and cap_mcast() to help us check if an
IB device or it's port support Multicast.
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:13:19AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 04:47:36PM +0100, Michael Wang wrote:
Introduce helper has_iwarp() to help us check if an IB device
support IWARP protocol.
Should probably be !has_rdma_read_sges()
True if the device can handle
201 - 220 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
