On 12:18 Mon 02 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Yet another (likely even more efficient) approach would be memset()ing
MFTs in realloc function above requested mlid_offset, then we will be
able to remove osm_mcast_tbl_clear_mlid() completely.
Isn't mlid clearing done on a per mlid basis
On 12:44 Mon 02 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
clear_mlid could be implemented with memset rather than loop.
Yes, memset() would be better.
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky sas...@voltaire.com wrote:
Set switch's mcast table max_mlid_ho as actually configured mlid for the
switch instead of a value extended to MFT block size aligned. This makes
mlid handling checks to be more reliable.
Signed-off-by: Sasha
On 09:48 Fri 30 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_mcast_tbl.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_mcast_tbl.c
index b5ae6f2..eee9290 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_mcast_tbl.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_mcast_tbl.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int osm_mcast_tbl_realloc(IN
Set switch's mcast table max_mlid_ho as actually configured mlid for the
switch instead of a value extended to MFT block size aligned. This makes
mlid handling checks to be more reliable.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky sas...@voltaire.com
---
opensm/opensm/osm_mcast_tbl.c |5 +++--
1 files
Hi Ira,
Thanks for reporting.
On 15:44 Thu 29 Oct , Ira Weiny wrote:
OpenSM $ mlid_ho 49152; p_tbl-max_mlid_ho 49152
mlid_ho 49154; p_tbl-max_mlid_ho 49153
opensm: osm_mcast_tbl.c:107: osm_mcast_tbl_set: Assertion `mlid_ho =
p_tbl-max_mlid_ho' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
Small
