On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 7:04 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 09:35 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:24 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
+
+ rsv = (req_type == SRP_REQ_NORMAL) ? SRP_TSK_MGMT_RSV : 0;
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:24 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
+
+ rsv = (req_type == SRP_REQ_NORMAL) ? SRP_TSK_MGMT_RSV : 0;
srp_send_completion(target-send_cq, target);
- if (target-tx_head - target-tx_tail = SRP_SQ_SIZE)
+ if (target-tx_head -
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 09:35 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:24 PM, David Dillow d...@thedillows.org wrote:
+
+ rsv = (req_type == SRP_REQ_NORMAL) ? SRP_TSK_MGMT_RSV : 0;
srp_send_completion(target-send_cq, target);
- if (target-tx_head -
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 20:33 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
@@ -820,9 +820,11 @@ static int srp_post_recv(struct srp_target_port *target)
unsigned int next;
int ret;
+ BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(SRP_RQ_MASK + 1);
+
Please put this together with the other build bug in the
The information unit transmit ring (srp_target.tx_ring) in ib_srp is currently
only used for allocating requests sent by the initiator to the target. This
patch prepares using that ring buffer for allocation of both requests and
responses. Also, this patch differentiates the uses of SRP_SQ_SIZE,
