On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 16:18 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:03:19PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
AFAIK, capturing provided tags is considered best practice as a way to
recognize and retain contributors.
Agreed. I'll double check them tomorrow.
These are two I
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
New items since the last push:
Jason's fix to the CMA for IPv4/IPv6 canonization
Hariprasad's series to iw_cxgb4
Tatyana's and Steve's series for iWARP portmapper address resolution
I just sent the previous batch, since
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 10:10 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
New items since the last push:
Jason's fix to the CMA for IPv4/IPv6 canonization
Hariprasad's series to iw_cxgb4
Tatyana's and Steve's series for iWARP
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 15:37 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:26:47AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Wed,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems like Roland isn't around to carry the rdma pull request for 4.1 ...
Why do you ignore my emails (I see no reply to
On Apr 11, 2015 12:28 PM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
If taking off the maintainer hat would get you some free/spare cycles,
maybe you could resume posting in the digitalvampire blog and/or
participate in the upstreamming of soft-RoCE driver? some folks here
are working on this, so
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems like Roland isn't around to carry the rdma pull request for 4.1 ...
Why do you ignore my emails (I see no reply to
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg24194.html) and jump to
this conclusion?
I will send a pull
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 15:37 -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:26:47AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Let’s take this
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:26:47AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Let’s take this as a starting point. If there are other patches
people think
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Let’s take this as a starting point. If there are other patches
people think should make 4.1, please bring them to my attention and
I’ll add them for review and possible addition to the list.
git://github.com/dledford/linux.git
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Let’s take this as a starting point. If there are other patches
people think should make 4.1, please bring them to my attention and
I’ll add
On 4/15/2015 4:07 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Apr 15, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Sagi Grimberg sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote:
On 4/15/2015 3:39 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Pradeep Kankipati pradeep.kankip...@emulex.com
wrote:
We at Emulex, have been working with Doug on
On Apr 15, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Sagi Grimberg sa...@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote:
On 4/15/2015 3:39 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Pradeep Kankipati
pradeep.kankip...@emulex.com wrote:
We at Emulex, have been working with Doug on the RH inboxing effort for a
while and
On 4/15/2015 3:39 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Pradeep Kankipati pradeep.kankip...@emulex.com
wrote:
We at Emulex, have been working with Doug on the RH inboxing effort for a while
and feel this just makes complete sense for him to take on this role for all
the
; Hefty, Sean; Roland Dreier; Hal
Rosenstock; David Miller; Or Gerlitz; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org;
ta...@mellanox.com; Amir Vadai; Sagi Grimberg; Haggai Eran; Shachar Raindel
Subject: Re: Stepping down as maintainer (was Re: [PATCH for-next 0/9] mlx4
changes in virtual GID management
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
Regardless of what we end up doing long term, Roland is out at the moment, so
4.1 is happening more or less without him :-/
Sorry. I am back at work now.
I went ahead and put together a 4.1 branch and pulled the
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
Regardless of what we end up doing long term, Roland is out at the moment,
so 4.1 is happening more or less without him :-/
Sorry. I am back at
Miller; Or Gerlitz; Weiny, Ira; linux-
r...@vger.kernel.org; ta...@mellanox.com; Amir Vadai; Sagi Grimberg; Haggai
Eran; Shachar Raindel
Subject: Re: Stepping down as maintainer (was Re: [PATCH for-next 0/9] mlx4
changes in virtual GID management)
On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:42 PM, Jason
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
Or, I was also a bit annoyed by your last email, the tone just seemed
inappropriate/in-gracious for the situation.
I made a full clarification and wait to see Sean's response. Sean is
doing excellent work
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
As far as patches go, you keep asking for reviews, but where are the
reviews from Mellanox? I count 45 @mellanox folks who contributed to
the kernel, but I wouldn't have guessed that based on mailing
list
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
Unfortunately, Sean -- you haven't provided for 2 months any
feedback on the patches to the CM/CMA modules which you own/maintain
for supporting name-spaces and such which are part of enabling proper
RDMA support for
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
I don't think you understand how deep the problem Or is
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:14:40PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:42 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 07:16:33PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
That would make sense to have someone like Doug or Jason being the
On 4/13/2015 8:14 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
Same here (having been asked privately to look into doing this). FWIW, Red Hat
has agreed that they are willing to allow me to transition my job to a full
time upstream focused position (as of now, I work on upstream around my
deliverables inside the
Same here (having been asked privately to look into doing this). FWIW,
Red Hat has agreed that they are willing to allow me to transition my job
to a full time upstream focused position (as of now, I work on upstream
around my deliverables inside the company).
Excellent. To me, this seems
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 04:10:16PM +, Hefty, Sean wrote:
Unfortunately, Sean -- you haven't provided for 2 months any
feedback on the patches to the CM/CMA modules which you own/maintain
for supporting name-spaces and such which are part of enabling proper
RDMA support for containers.
On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:42 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 07:16:33PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
That would make sense to have someone like Doug or Jason being the
potential successors to Roland in order to keep InfiniBand subsystem
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 07:16:33PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
That would make sense to have someone like Doug or Jason being the
potential successors to Roland in order to keep InfiniBand subsystem
vendor neutrality.
Several people have been asking me privately, I am looking into if
this
Unfortunately, Sean -- you haven't provided for 2 months any
feedback on the patches to the CM/CMA modules which you own/maintain
for supporting name-spaces and such which are part of enabling proper
RDMA support for containers.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdevm=142366747608908w=2 This makes
Hi,
Le vendredi 10 avril 2015 à 20:39 +, Hefty, Sean a écrit :
I'm on a perhaps-unfortunately-timed vacation this week, but to make
the transition smooth, I'll handle the easy patches that are in flight
for 4.1, and then turn things over to the community for 4.2. (Unless
the feeling
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
This thread has made me realize that even as I am able to carve out
more time to work on things like IB maintaintership, I no longer
have the desire to spend my time maintaining the IB subsystem.
Since my current level
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
I don't think you understand how deep the problem Or is describing goes.
[...Appropriate and correct critique...]
This thread has
I'm on a perhaps-unfortunately-timed vacation this week, but to make
the transition smooth, I'll handle the easy patches that are in flight
for 4.1, and then turn things over to the community for 4.2. (Unless
the feeling is that it's better for me to step down immediately — I
have no problem
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
I don't think you understand how deep the problem Or is describing
goes.
[...Appropriate and correct critique...]
This thread has made me realize that even as I am able to carve out more time
to
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 10:41 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
I don't think you understand how deep the problem Or is describing
goes.
[...Appropriate and correct critique...]
This thread has made me
This thread has made me realize that even as I am able to carve out
more time to work on things like IB maintaintership, I no longer
have the desire to spend my time maintaining the IB subsystem.
Since my current level of activity is clearly hurting the community,
I've decided to step
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 10:41:13AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
This thread has made me realize that even as I am able to carve out
more time to work on things like IB maintaintership, I no longer
have the desire to spend my time maintaining the IB subsystem.
Since my current level of activity
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. No maintainer voice makes it kind of impossible for
discussions to converge. What happens over the last years is that when
there's no easy
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 04:46:26PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 07:51:08 -0700
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. No maintainer voice makes it kind of impossible for
discussions to
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. No maintainer voice makes it kind of impossible for
discussions to converge. What happens over the last years is that when
there's no easy consensus on matter Y, everyone stops breathing and
wait to see what
From: Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2015 07:51:08 -0700
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. No maintainer voice makes it kind of impossible for
discussions to converge. What happens over the last years is that when
there's no easy
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:31 AM, ira.weiny ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 05:32:53PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
[snip]
Your claim says more or less don't touch the good old
include/rdma/ib_verbs.h from
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 05:32:53PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
[snip]
Your claim says more or less don't touch the good old
include/rdma/ib_verbs.h from 2.6.12, just add new low-level drivers
-- this is very close to
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
I must disagree. You made this claim back when we submitted the IB
core patch which adds support for signature, protection etc offloads
(commit 1b01d33560e7 IB/core: Introduce signature verbs API and the
detailed replied
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
Roland, I have to genuinely agree with Or, that your handling of
patch integration is sub-par and really painful for anyone actually
trying to get real work done here.
If you simply don't have the time to devote to
On 3/31/2015 6:47 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
Roland, I have to genuinely agree with Or, that your handling of
patch integration is sub-par and really painful for anyone actually
trying to get real work done here.
If you simply don't have the time to devote to constantly reviewing
patches as they
Well this needs to be addressed yes but in order to have that done someone
needs to step forward do the proper work, maintain git trees, do the
review and show up for the conferences. Neither Roland nor Or was there at
the Infiniband conferences in Monterey this year(!) and this is the prime
venue
On 3/31/2015 8:49 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Well this needs to be addressed yes but in order to have that done someone
needs to step forward do the proper work, maintain git trees, do the
review and show up for the conferences. Neither Roland nor Or was there at
the Infiniband conferences
From: Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:22:50 +0300
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Roland Dreier rol...@kernel.org wrote:
Roland, I have to genuinely agree with Or, that your handling of
patch integration is sub-par and really painful for anyone actually
trying to
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Sean and Hal showed up for the conference. Sean is active mostly in
focusing on userspace stuff. Both could become more involved in the kernel
ib tree and the review process? Hal is employed by Mellanox but is not
participating in these patch
From: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:49:38 -0500 (CDT)
Well this needs to be addressed yes but in order to have that done someone
needs to step forward do the proper work, maintain git trees, do the
review and show up for the conferences. Neither Roland nor Or was
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, David Miller wrote:
Well this needs to be addressed yes but in order to have that done someone
needs to step forward do the proper work, maintain git trees, do the
review and show up for the conferences. Neither Roland nor Or was there at
the Infiniband conferences in
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:13:58PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
We had a talk about a similar topic at LSFMM15. Linux-scsi subsystem
is a large scale subsystem and also has the single maintainer with
limited time for upstream maintenance bottleneck.
Christoph created the scsi-queue tree to
It doesn't take a lot of time to do this work, especially if you use
the correct tools. I can review and apply 100 patches a day, even
when I'm on vacation. I'm an extreme example, but what you're doing
right now Roland is not acceptable and is not in agreement with your
claims about how
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Hefty, Sean sean.he...@intel.com wrote:
I honestly think part of the issue here is general approach being taken by
the rdma stack, which is to expose every hardware specific component that a
vendor might define through the interfaces up to the consumers.
I must disagree. You made this claim back when we submitted the IB
core patch which adds support for signature, protection etc offloads
(commit 1b01d33560e7 IB/core: Introduce signature verbs API and the
detailed replied you got were explaining that
And I'll continue to make this claim
From: Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:17:01 +0300
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Or Gerlitz ogerl...@mellanox.com wrote:
Under the existing implementation for virtual GIDs, if the SM is not
reachable or incurs a delayed response, or if the VF is probed into a
VM
Roland, I have to genuinely agree with Or, that your handling of
patch integration is sub-par and really painful for anyone actually
trying to get real work done here.
If you simply don't have the time to devote to constantly reviewing
patches as they come in, and doing so in a timely
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Or Gerlitz ogerl...@mellanox.com wrote:
Under the existing implementation for virtual GIDs, if the SM is not
reachable or incurs a delayed response, or if the VF is probed into a
VM before their GUID is registered with the SM, there exists a window
in time in
Under the existing implementation for virtual GIDs, if the SM is not
reachable or incurs a delayed response, or if the VF is probed into a
VM before their GUID is registered with the SM, there exists a window
in time in which the VF sees an incorrect GID, i.e., not the GID that
was intended by
60 matches
Mail list logo
