Re: [PATCH for-next V2 3/5] IB/mlx5: Add support for hca_core_clock and timestamp_mask

2015-12-16 Thread Sagi Grimberg
Reporting the hca_core_clock (in kHZ) and the timestamp_mask in query_device extended verb. timestamp_mask is used by users in order to know what is the valid range of the raw timestamps, while hca_core_clock reports the clock frequency that is used for timestamps. Hi Matan, Shouldn't this

Re: [PATCH for-next V2 3/5] IB/mlx5: Add support for hca_core_clock and timestamp_mask

2015-12-16 Thread Matan Barak
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> Reporting the hca_core_clock (in kHZ) and the timestamp_mask in >> query_device extended verb. timestamp_mask is used by users in order >> to know what is the valid range of the raw timestamps, while >>

[PATCH for-next V2 3/5] IB/mlx5: Add support for hca_core_clock and timestamp_mask

2015-12-15 Thread Matan Barak
Reporting the hca_core_clock (in kHZ) and the timestamp_mask in query_device extended verb. timestamp_mask is used by users in order to know what is the valid range of the raw timestamps, while hca_core_clock reports the clock frequency that is used for timestamps. Signed-off-by: Matan Barak