Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-11-09 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
On 19:43 Thu 04 Feb , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote: Subject: [PATCH] Wrong handling of MC create and delete traps For these traps the GID in the data details is the MGID and not the source port gid. So the SM should check that subscriber port has the pkey of the MC group. There was

Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-08 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Eli Dorfman dorfman@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:43 PM,

Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-08 Thread Eli Dorfman (Voltaire)
Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Eli Dorfman dorfman@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu,

Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-08 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Eli Dorfman dorfman@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-07 Thread Eli Dorfman (Voltaire)
Hal Rosenstock wrote: On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Eli Dorfman dorfman@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Subject: [PATCH] Wrong handling

Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-05 Thread Eli Dorfman
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Subject: [PATCH] Wrong handling of MC create and delete traps For these traps the GID in the data details is the MGID and not

Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-05 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Eli Dorfman dorfman@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Subject: [PATCH] Wrong handling of MC create and

[PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-04 Thread Eli Dorfman (Voltaire)
Subject: [PATCH] Wrong handling of MC create and delete traps For these traps the GID in the data details is the MGID and not the source port gid. So the SM should check that subscriber port has the pkey of the MC group. There was also an error in comparing the subnet prefix and guid due to

Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: bug in trap report for MC create(66) and delete(67) traps

2010-02-04 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) dorfman@gmail.com wrote: Subject: [PATCH] Wrong handling of MC create and delete traps For these traps the GID in the data details is the MGID and not the source port gid. So the SM should check that subscriber port has the pkey of