Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

FYI, the only conflict as reported in linux-next last week is with nfsd tree and "IB: merge struct ib_device_attr into struct ib_device" here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-next=145155049101826=2 It looks like there is ongoing discussion this morning wrt rdma + nfsd trees.. Do you still want

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 12:22 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> Applied to target-pending/for-next as v4.5-rc1 material, along with > >> Reviewed-by tags from HCH. > > > > So this is both in your and Dougs now it seems. Given the non-trivial > > merge with the other RDMA updates I'd suggest to drop

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Sagi Grimberg > wrote: > >>> Sagi, are you going to spin an increment in the initiator version? > >> I don't know if it's worth a driver version update? > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

> Applied to target-pending/for-next as v4.5-rc1 material, along with > Reviewed-by tags from HCH. So this is both in your and Dougs now it seems. Given the non-trivial merge with the other RDMA updates I'd suggest to drop it from the target tree as Doug already sorted out the merge. -- To

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

Applied to target-pending/for-next as v4.5-rc1 material, along with Reviewed-by tags from HCH. So this is both in your and Dougs now it seems. Given the non-trivial merge with the other RDMA updates I'd suggest to drop it from the target tree as Doug already sorted out the merge. Yea, this

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

Hey Nic, Applied to target-pending/for-next as v4.5-rc1 material, along with Reviewed-by tags from HCH. Thanks for picking this up! Note that I expect this patchset will conflict with Doug's pull request in case he's taking Christoph's device_attr and CQ abstraction patches for 4.5. Doug,

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

Sagi, are you going to spin an increment in the initiator version? I don't know if it's worth a driver version update? In case we do increment, I can send an incremental patch instead of re-spinning the entire series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma"

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Applied to target-pending/for-next as v4.5-rc1 material, along with > Reviewed-by tags from HCH. Hi Nic, thanks for stepping in and picking that. Sagi, are you going to spin an increment in the initiator

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

Hi Sagi, Jenny & Co, On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 14:11 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > Changes from v1: > - Fixed change-log typos > > Changes from v0: > - Rebased on top of 4.4-rc2 > - Removed iser_hello messages from the protocol header > - Avoided from further breaking the non-existent bidi support >

[PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate

Changes from v1: - Fixed change-log typos Changes from v0: - Rebased on top of 4.4-rc2 - Removed iser_hello messages from the protocol header - Avoided from further breaking the non-existent bidi support - Fixed initiator remote invalidate support exposure only for fastreg &&