On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 17:58:19 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
BTW, if you're frustrated from having to send these patches so many
times because of changes being requested, this is the main reason
why you shouldn't queue up such enormous numbers of patches at one
time.
Please try to
On 04/03/2014 14:41, Hariprasad Shenai wrote:
Hariprasad Shenai (1):
Revert cxgb4: Don't assume LSO only uses SGL path in t4_eth_xmit()
Kumar Sanghvi (5):
cxgb4: Fix some small bugs in t4_sge_init_soft() when our Page Size is
64KB
cxgb4: Add code to dump SGE registers when hitting
Yes, thanks mightily for your help and advice and sorry for the size of the
updates. Hari has taken on the very difficult task of synchronizing our
out-of-kernel development branch with the in-kernel code. These two code bases
have drifted apart quite a bit because of the difficulty of
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Casey Leedom lee...@chelsio.com wrote:
Yes, thanks mightily for your help and advice and sorry for the size of the
updates. Hari has taken on the very difficult task of synchronizing our
out-of-kernel development branch with the in-kernel code. These two
On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Casey Leedom lee...@chelsio.com wrote:
Yes, thanks mightily for your help and advice and sorry for the size of the
updates. Hari has taken on the very difficult task of synchronizing our
On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Casey Leedom lee...@chelsio.com wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Casey Leedom lee...@chelsio.com wrote:
Yes, thanks
On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Casey Leedom lee...@chelsio.com wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Or Gerlitz or.gerl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Casey Leedom lee...@chelsio.com wrote:
are you referring to constants defined in
BTW, if you're frustrated from having to send these patches so many
times because of changes being requested, this is the main reason
why you shouldn't queue up such enormous numbers of patches at one
time.
Please try to keep your future submissions sizes more reasonable,
perhaps ~10
BTW, if you're frustrated from having to send these patches so many
times because of changes being requested, this is the main reason
why you shouldn't queue up such enormous numbers of patches at one
time.
Please try to keep your future submissions sizes more reasonable,
perhaps ~10 patches or
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 13:22:26 -0500, David Miller wrote:
BTW, if you're frustrated from having to send these patches so many
times because of changes being requested, this is the main reason
why you shouldn't queue up such enormous numbers of patches at one
time.
Please try to keep
10 matches
Mail list logo
