Sorry for the massive lag in this conversation - between trying to balance
working with Linux-RDMA with the rest of my job, support problems and
vacations, this got pushed to the bottom of my queue while I thought about the
best approach to the issue.
When we left this, we were discussing the
enum ibv_event_type {
...
+ IBV_EVENT_GID
...
struct ibv_async_event {
union {
+ struct ibv_gid_event *gid_event;
...
+ int ibv_reg_gid_event(struct ibv_context *context, uint8_t port_num);
We need to get Roland's thoughts on
That thought occurred to me, but I thought it might be easier for the app
developer if the api explicitly broke up the generic concepts of traps and
notices into specific types.
-Original Message-
From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On
