linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the infiniband tree

2013-08-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi James, Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c between commit b7f04513090c (IB/iser: Accept session-cmds_max from user space) from the infiniband tree and commit 6a06a4b8cff8 ([SCSI] IB/iser: Add Discovery support) from the scsi

Re: [PATCH] IB/srp: add change_queue_depth and change_queue_type support

2013-08-27 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 08/26/13 15:53, Jack Wang wrote: From: Jack Wang jinpu.w...@profitbricks.com Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:50:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] IB/srp: add change_queue_depth/change_queue_type support Signed-off-by: Jack Wang jinpu.w...@profitbricks.com Hello Jack, When posting a Linux kernel patch

Re: [PATCH] IB/srp: add change_queue_depth and change_queue_type support

2013-08-27 Thread Jack Wang
On 08/27/2013 10:31 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: On 08/26/13 15:53, Jack Wang wrote: From: Jack Wang jinpu.w...@profitbricks.com Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:50:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] IB/srp: add change_queue_depth/change_queue_type support Signed-off-by: Jack Wang jinpu.w...@profitbricks.com

RE: [PATCH 0/2] fs: supply inode uid/gid setting interface

2013-08-27 Thread David Laight
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs: supply inode uid/gid setting interface On 2013/8/23 12:10, Greg KH wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:48:36AM +0800, Rui Xiang wrote: This patchset implements an accessor functions to set uid/gid in inode struct. Just finish code clean up. Why? It can

Re: [PATCH V5 for-next 3/4] IB/core: Export ib_create/destroy_flow through uverbs

2013-08-27 Thread Matan Barak
On 26/8/2013 10:01 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Or Gerlitz ogerl...@mellanox.com wrote: + if (cmd.flow_attr.num_of_specs) { + kern_flow_attr = kmalloc(cmd.flow_attr.size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!kern_flow_attr) +

[PATCH 2/2 opensm] Improve m_key lookup

2013-08-27 Thread Hal Rosenstock
From: Alex Netes ale...@mellanox.com Lookup for M_Key only when you don't know the M_Key (till you get GetResp(PortInfo) from the port). In other cases use the M_Key stored in the PortInfo. Signed-off-by: Alex Netes ale...@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock h...@mellanox.com ---

Re: [PATCH libibverbs V2] Add new verb: uv_query_port_max_datagram()

2013-08-27 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Bump. This is V2 of the patch, which removes the ABI issue: libibverbs directly calls the command in the kernel (without going through the provider plugin). On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com wrote: Per lengthy discussion on the linux-rdma list, add a new verb to

Re: [PATCH] IB/srp: add change_queue_depth and change_queue_type support

2013-08-27 Thread Jack Wang
snip This code seems incorrect to me for the SRP protocol. In the SRP protocol, although there is no TCQ support, queue depths above one are supported. I also have a more general remark. There is no TCQ support in the SRP protocol, which means that sdev-tagged_supported is always 0 (false).

Re: [PATCH] IB/srp: add change_queue_depth and change_queue_type support

2013-08-27 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 08/27/13 18:39, Jack Wang wrote: I look into scsi core about above statement: In drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:865: if ((sdev-scsi_level = SCSI_2) (inq_result[7] 2) !(*bflags BLIST_NOTQ)) sdev-tagged_supported = 1; It check inquiry result byte 7

Re: [PATCH V5 for-next 1/4] IB/core: Add receive Flow Steering support

2013-08-27 Thread Matan Barak
On 26/8/2013 10:07 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Or Gerlitz ogerl...@mellanox.com wrote: +struct _ib_flow_spec { Just out of curiousity, why does this structure name start with _? In fact why have the struct at all, since all it's doing is wrapping an anonymous

Re: [PATCH 02/14] RDMA/ocrdma: Add support for FRMR.

2013-08-27 Thread Bart Van Assche
Hello Naresh, Good question. I'm not sure though what Roland prefers. Bart. On 08/27/13 16:33, B.A.L.N.Raju Gottumukkala wrote: Hi Bert, Sure I will change that. Some of the patches in this patch series will also get affected because of that. It will be easy for us to address that as a

RE: [PATCH librdmacm 0/3] no IBV_SEND_INLINE thus memory registration required on QLogic/Intel HCA

2013-08-27 Thread Hefty, Sean
While doing some tests, I've found that rdma_client failed on my QLogic/Intel QLE7340 / QLE7342 HCA: # rdma_client rdma_client: start rdma_post_send 22 rdma_client: end -1 I had a deeper look on the examples and found that max_inline_data was returned as 0, The man

RE: [PATCH librdmacm] examples: adds cmtime to .gitignore

2013-08-27 Thread Hefty, Sean
thanks - applied -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html