Re: OpenSM plugin patch request

2011-10-24 Thread Karl Schulz
On Oct 17, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote: A couple of minor comments: 1. Why not move the OSM_EVENT_ID_LIGHT_SWEEP_DONE event to where LIGHT SWEEP COMPLETE is indicated in osm_state_mgr.c ? That's actually more accurate as all the transactions have completed. 2. The new events

Re: OpenSM plugin patch request

2011-10-17 Thread Karl Schulz
://www.mail-archive.com/linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org/msg02206.html It wasn't applied as is back then, but you might want it now. -- YK On 13-Oct-11 4:50 AM, Karl Schulz wrote: Thanks Ira, My apologies for not following the conventional standard. Should I generate a new patch? -k

OpenSM plugin patch request

2011-10-12 Thread Karl Schulz
Hello, Would it be possible to consider exposing light-sweep events to the current OpenSM plugin interface? Something along the lines of the attached patch is what we are using locally against opensm-3.3.9. The motivation is to support a plugin module we have written to expose topology

Re: OpenSM plugin patch request

2011-10-12 Thread Karl Schulz
, + OSM_EVENT_ID_LIGHT_SWEEP_START, + OSM_EVENT_ID_LIGHT_SWEEP_DONE, Traditionally the MAX value in the enum is kept at the end. Ira On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:31:07 -0700 Karl Schulz k...@tacc.utexas.edu wrote: Hello, Would it be possible to consider exposing light-sweep events to the current OpenSM