On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
+static ssize_t srpt_tpg_attrib_store_srp_max_rsp_size(
+ struct se_portal_group *se_tpg,
+ const char *page,
+ size_t count)
+{
+ struct srpt_port *sport = container_of(se_tpg, struct
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
+static ssize_t srpt_tpg_attrib_store_srp_max_rsp_size(
+ struct se_portal_group *se_tpg,
+ const char *page,
+ size_t count)
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
+static ssize_t srpt_tpg_attrib_store_srp_max_rsp_size(
+
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:58 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:58 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Also, isn't kstrto*() preferred over strict_strto*() ?
Not AFAIK.
This is what I found in the description of commit 33ee3b2:
kstrto*: converting
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 22:11 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:58 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 22:16 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
n...@linux-iscsi.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Also, isn't kstrto*() preferred over strict_strto*() ?
Not AFAIK.
This is what I found
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
This patch converts the srp_max_rsp_size module parameter into a per
port configfs attribute. This includes adding the necessary bits for
show + store attributes w/ min/max bounds checking, and dropping
the legacy WARN_ON() as sport_port is not
