On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:50:05 -0700
Roland Dreier rdre...@cisco.com wrote:
Looks fine to me. ehca guys, any objection?
We don't have any objections.
Acked-by: Alexander Schmidt al...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a
thanks, applied
--
Roland Dreier rola...@cisco.com || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
Looks fine to me. ehca guys, any objection?
--
Roland Dreier rola...@cisco.com || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to
From: Julia Lawall ju...@diku.dk
list_for_each_entry binds its first argument to a non-null value, and thus
any null test on the value of that argument is superfluous.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// smpl
@@
iterator I;
expression x;