Should be 132 rather than 131 according to IANA IP protocol IDs
Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.com
Acked-by: Sean Hefty sean.he...@intel.com
---
Thanks. I just noticed this this morning after reviewing the luster patches.
You beat me to the patch.
diff --git
-RDMA_PS_SCTP = 0x0183
+RDMA_PS_SCTP = 0x0184
The old wrong value has been there since we first merged this. So
changing it means anything using this in userspace would be broken. But
is PS_SCTP exported to userspace? And as far as I can tell PS_SCTP is
not implemented (this
The old wrong value has been there since we first merged this. So
changing it means anything using this in userspace would be broken. But
is PS_SCTP exported to userspace? And as far as I can tell PS_SCTP is
not implemented (this line is the only reference to RDMA_PS_SCTP in the
whole kernel).
Technically, I believe it's available to userspace, though the librdmacm
doesn't
define it. I'd be surprised if anything uses it.
Wouldn't trying to use RDMA_PS_SCTP hit the
default:
return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
case in cma_get_port()? So one couldn't actually do
Wouldn't trying to use RDMA_PS_SCTP hit the
default:
return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
case in cma_get_port()? So one couldn't actually do anything with
RDMA_PS_SCTP? Or is there some way to avoid binding?
You're right. There isn't any way to actually do anything with it. All
